Huntzinger v. McCrae
| Decision Date | 16 November 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-CA-2670-S,89-CA-2670-S |
| Citation | 818 S.W.2d 613 |
| Parties | Earl HUNTZINGER and Shirley June Huntzinger, Appellants, v. C.A. McCRAE, Patricia Meigs Pitt, Rose, Short & Pitt, and Robert B. Duggan, Appellees. |
| Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Jerry Anderson, Lexington, for appellants.
Robert L. Templeton, Ashland, for appellees Patricia Pitt and Rose, Short & Pitt.
Charles A. McCrae, Portsmouth, Ohio, for appellee McCrae.
Dana E. Deering, Covington, for appellee Duggan.
Before HOWERTON, C.J., and HOWARD and MILLER, JJ.
Earl and Shirley J. Huntzinger appeal from an order entered September 18, 1989, dismissing their complaint, and from an order entered November 16, 1989, denying their motion to set aside the order of dismissal, and denying their motion to have the Honorable Stephen N. Frazier, Special Judge, recuse himself. We affirm the orders of the Boyd Circuit Court.
This case has been before the Boyd Circuit Court three times and before this Court twice. The first instance was as a foreclosure action filed by First Bank and Trust Company (First Bank) and Kentucky Farmers Bank against the Huntzingers and others claiming an interest in some real and personal property in Boyd County. The Honorable Charles Sinnette, Judge of the Boyd Circuit Court, presided in that case, which was affirmed on appeal to this Court on June 28, 1985.
The Huntzingers then filed suit against their original attorney in the foreclosure action, the purchasers of some of the real property, and the two banks involved, alleging improper sale and disposition of proceeds of sale. Judge Sinnette recused himself and Judge Frazier, as chief regional circuit judge for the 24th Judicial Circuit, assigned himself to the case, although Special Judge Caswell P. Lane was ultimately the presiding judge. This suit was dismissed on March 27, 1986, by Judge Lane, based on issue preclusion. The court determined that the Huntzingers failed to raise the issue of improper sale and disposition in the foreclosure action even though the information was or should have been available to them, citing Combs v. Prestonsburg Water Co., 260 Ky. 169, 84 S.W.2d 15 (1935), and Gilbert v. Bowling Green Bank & Trust, Ky., 460 S.W.2d 14 (1970). That order was affirmed by this Court on May 22, 1987, based on res judicata. This Court found that there was an identity of parties with the foreclosure action with the addition of the Huntzingers' attorney, that there was an identity of causes of action, and that the prior action had been tried on the merits. See Newman v. Newman, Ky., 451 S.W.2d 417 (1970).
Now the Huntzingers have filed essentially the same complaint with the Boyd Circuit Court, with the exception that the Huntzingers have replaced the banks as parties with the banks' attorneys and the law firm representing one of the banks. Then, citing unavailability for service, Judge Frazier assigned Judge Lane to preside over all pending matters in the 24th Judicial Circuit, Division One, from September 13-15, 1989. It was during this period that the complaint was dismissed by order signed on September 15, 1989, by Judge Lane, and entered September 18, 1989. The Huntzingers' motion to set aside that order and motion also to have Judge Frazier recuse himself from the case entirely were denied on November 16, 1989.
The Huntzingers now appeal to this Court, contending that the appointment of Judge Lane did not conform to the law and thus he was without jurisdiction to decide the case; that Judge Frazier should have recused himself; and that their attorney in the foreclosure suit defrauded them by paying an inferior lien, causing the unnecessary sale of their property.
We believe that Judge Lane's appointment was appropriate. The Regional Administration Program Charter, at Sec. V.I.a, provides that when a special judge is needed, the chief regional circuit judge will "appoint a circuit judge within the region or, if none is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jones v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...have brought forward." Stephens v. Goodenough, 560 S.W.2d 556, 558 (Ky., 1977) (emphasis added). See also, e.g., Huntzinger v. McCrae, 818 S.W.2d 613, 615 (Ky.App., 1990); Dennis v. Fiscal Court of Bullitt Co., 784 S.W.2d 608, 611 (Ky.App., 1990). The doctrine of res judicata has a subsidia......
-
Kuprion v. Fitzgerald
...litigation in Jefferson Circuit Court because it would otherwise clog the dockets of every division of that court. Huntzinger v. McCrae, Ky.App., 818 S.W.2d 613 (1991), permitted a chief regional circuit judge to appoint a special circuit judge from outside the region. Although it is unclea......
-
Kirschbaum v. Wells Fargo, N.A.
...the parties on the first appeal." Miller v. Administrative Office of the Courts, 361 S.W.3d 867, 871-872 (quoting Huntzinger v. McCrae, 818 S.W.2d 613, 615 (Ky. Ct. App. 1990)). Three elements must be present for further litigation to be barred by claim preclusion: "(1) identity of the part......
-
In re Thomas
...any facts to the Chief Justice. In denying Thomas's motions, the circuit court found this argument unavailing, citing Huntzinger v. McCrae, 818 S.W.2d 613 (Ky. App. 1990), for the proposition that "[a]n appointment to serve as special judge does not in all cases require the Circuit Court Cl......