Hurd v. Stout

Decision Date25 October 1983
Citation469 N.Y.S.2d 698,60 N.Y.2d 787,457 N.E.2d 805
Parties, 457 N.E.2d 805 In the Matter of David N. HURD, etc., Appellant, v. R. Wells STOUT, et al., constituting the New York State Board of Elections, and Frank H. Armani, etc., Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division, 97 A.D.2d 616, 468 N.Y.S.2d 220.

COOKE, C.J., and JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Settineri v. DiCarlo, 1
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 26, 1993
    ...are no extraordinary or exigent circumstances present here that might justify judicial intervention (see, Matter of Hurd v. Stout, 60 N.Y.2d 787, 469 N.Y.S.2d 698, 457 N.E.2d 805; Matter of Gammerman v. Board of Elections of the City of N.Y., 57 N.Y.2d 888, 456 N.Y.S.2d 48, 442 N.E.2d 446; ......
  • Fahey v. New York State Bd. of Elections
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 25, 1996
    ...84 N.Y.2d 807, 621 N.Y.S.2d 516, 645 N.E.2d 1216; Matter of Hurd v. Stout, 97 A.D.2d 616, 617, 468 N.Y.S.2d 220, affd 60 N.Y.2d 787, 469 N.Y.S.2d 698, 457 N.E.2d 805). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly dismissed the ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs. 1 At no time follow......
  • Fuentes v. Catalano
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 18, 2018
    ...recite what actions transpired at the convention (see Matter of Hurd v. Stout, 97 A.D.2d 616, 468 N.Y.S.2d 220, affd 60 N.Y.2d 787, 469 N.Y.S.2d 698, 457 N.E.2d 805 ), and their description of events, when properly attested to by the authorized convention officials, is entitled to a presump......
  • Acca v. Kosinski, 529958
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 8, 2019
    ...N.Y.S.3d 116 113 N.E.3d 950 [2018] ; Matter of Hurd v. Stout, 97 A.D.2d 616, 617, 468 N.Y.S.2d 220 [1983], affd for reasons stated below 60 N.Y.2d 787, 469 N.Y.S.2d 698, 457 N.E.2d 805 [1983] ). Rather, "[w]here there is a showing of both a compelling explanation for the deviation from the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT