Hutcheson v. State
| Decision Date | 10 June 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 36187,36187 |
| Parties | HUTCHESON v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Larsen & Lewis, William Washington Larsen, Jr., Dublin, for appellant.
H. R. Thompson, Dist. Atty., Richard A. Malone, Asst. Dist. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Hutcheson was convicted of the murder of his fiancee and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals, enumerating six errors. We reverse.
1. It was error for the trial court to refuse to dismiss from the jury panel for cause two Vidalia police officers, Carolyn C. Calhoun and Sgt. John Ward. Both appeared in court in police uniform when summoned to serve on the panel of 42 prospective jurors from which appellant's jury was to be selected. Sgt. Ward testified on voir dire he wore his uniform and gun because he was on duty at the time.
Police officers, employed full-time, are not normally included on jury lists by the board of jury commissioners under authority of Code Ann. § 59-112 et seq. (Ga.L. 1967, p. 725, as amended). 1 But, these officers are eligible to be jurors by making it known in writing to the board or its clerk that they do want to be included in the jury box. Code Ann. § 59-112(a)(1). However, we must conclude that if they are challenged for cause in a criminal case that such request must be granted. 2 "Jurors should be above suspicion." Beall v. Clark, 71 Ga. 818, 849 (1883); Snead v. State, 167 Ga. 271, 273, 145 S.E. 510 (1928). It is inherent in the nature of police duties and the closeness with which such officers are identified with criminal procedures that questions regarding possible bias, fairness, prejudice or impermissible influence upon jury deliberations inevitably arise. These questions cannot be erased by a mere subjective, albeit sincere, declaration by the officer that he or she can be fair and impartial as to a defendant. "The constitutional test of impartiality, however, does not turn on the subjective declarations of the individual jurors . . ." United States v. Smith, 200 F.Supp. 885, 908, quoting from Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961).
2. Appellant was required to use two peremptory challenges to remove the officers from the panel, thus exhausting his peremptory challenges before the jury was selected. Under the opinion of this court in Bradham v. State, 243 Ga. 638, 639(3), 256 S.E.2d 331 (1979), we must reverse.
3. In view of our holdings in Divisions 1 and 2, we need not reach the other enumerations.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
1 "(a) The following persons are exempt from all jury duty, civil or criminal; the name of any such person...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cargill v. State
...for Bank South. Police officers employed full-time must be excused if challenged for cause in criminal cases. Hutcheson v. State, 246 Ga. 13(1), 268 S.E.2d 643 (1980). However, it was held in Wilson v. State, 250 Ga. 630 (4a), 300 S.E.2d 640 (1983), that this holding in Hutcheson did not ap......
-
Butts v. State
...have been disqualified as potential jurors. However, correctional officers are not subject to the automatic disqualification rule of Hutcheson v. State,11 and "[b]lanket disqualification of jurors based solely upon their membership in a group to which the victim belonged is not 7. The trial......
-
Todd v. State
...examiner employed by the Department of Public Safety. This juror was not a full-time police officer that, under Hutcheson v. State, 246 Ga. 13, 268 S.E.2d 643 (1980), must be excused for cause automatically upon request, no matter what the officer's voir dire answers show. The automatic exc......
-
Hill v. State
...challenged for cause in a criminal case. Moreover, the juror here was no longer so employed at the time of the trial. Hutcheson v. State, 246 Ga. 13, 268 S.E.2d 643 (1980), is therefore inapplicable and there is no merit to this enumeration of error. See Depree v. State, 246 Ga. 240(2), 271......
-
Friends and Foes in the Jury Box: Walls v. Kim and the Mission to Stop Improper Juror Rehabilitation - Kathleen Wright
...be presumed to be biased and should be excused." Id. 42. . See Beam, 260 Ga. at 785-86, 400 S.E.2d at 328. 43. . See Hutcheson v. State, 246 Ga. 13, 268 S.E.2d 643 (1980). But see Scruggs v. State, 227 Ga. App. 35, 488 S.E.2d 110 (1997); Thompson v. State, 212 Ga. App. 175, 442 S.E.2d 771 (......
-
Death Penalty Law - Michael Mears
...805, 426 S.E.2d 553 (1993)). 76. 273 Ga. 760, 546 S.E.2d 472 (2001). 77. Id. at 763, 546 S.E.2d at 479. 78. Id. 79. Id. 80. Id. 81. Id. 82. 246 Ga. 13, 268 S.E.2d 643 (1980). 83. 273 Ga. at 764, 546 S.E.2d at 479 (alteration in original) (quoting Wilson v. State, 271 Ga. 811, 816, 525 S.E.2......
-
Georgia Death Penalty Law - Mike Mears and Ken Driggs
...39. 271 Ga. 783, 523 S.E.2d 294 (1999). 40. Id. at 789, 523 S.E.2d at 299. 41. Id. at 783, 523 S.E.2d at 296 (quoting Hutcheson v. State, 246 Ga. 13, 14, 268 S.E.2d 643, 644 (1980)). 42. 271 Ga. 829, 524 S.E.2d 490 (1999). 43. Id. at 834, 524 S.E.2d at 500. 44. Id. at 834-35, 524 S.E.2d at ......