Hutchison v. United States, No. 71-1549.
| Citation | 450 F.2d 930 |
| Decision Date | 17 November 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-1549. |
| Parties | Kenneth Alexander HUTCHISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit) |
Jack L. Love, Federal Public Defender, has filed a memorandum opposing summary affirmance on behalf of appellant.
Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Hutchison pleaded guilty to a charge of escape from federal confinement, 18 U.S.C. § 751, and was sentenced to a two-year term of imprisonment. He was also subjected to administrative punishment where 375 days of accumulated "good time" was forfeited, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4165.
The first claim in this action is that the combination of administrative punishment and criminal conviction amounts to double jeopardy in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Numerous cases have held that this does not constitute double jeopardy and we agree. United States v. Lepiscopo, 429 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 948, 91 S.Ct. 255, 27 L.Ed.2d 254; Gilchrist v. United States, 427 F.2d 1132 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Apker, 419 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1969); United States v. Cordova, 414 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1969); United States v. Shapiro, 383 F.2d 680 (7th Cir. 1967); Hamrick v. Peyton, 349 F.2d 370 (4th Cir. 1965); Rush v. United States, 290 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1961); Mullican v. United States, 252 F.2d 398 (5th Cir. 1958); Patterson v. United States, 183 F.2d 327 (4th Cir. 1950), cert. denied 340 U.S. 893, 71 S.Ct. 200, 95 L.Ed. 647; Gibson v. United States, 161 F.2d 973 (6th Cir. 1947); Pagliaro v. Cox, 143 F.2d 900 (8th Cir. 1944).
The second claim is that the plea of guilty to the escape charge was involuntary since Hutchison would not have entered such a plea if he had known that "good time" credit had been forfeited. It is urged that Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, requires that a defendant be advised of the consequences of a guilty plea, and failure to mention the possible administrative punishment rendered the plea either involuntary or a failure to comply with Rule 11. We do not agree. The court imposed sentence for violation of the escape statute and it was unnecessary to advise Hutchison that he may also be subjected to administrative punishment. Our case of Jenkins v. United States, 420 F.2d 433 (10th Cir. 1970) is not in point since ineligibility for probation or parole was a definite practical consequence of the plea, necessitating such information be given Jenkins.
Upon docketing in this court, this matter was assigned to the summary...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Com. v. Boyd
...v. Lepiscopo, 429 F.2d 258, 261 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. den. 400 U.S. 948, 91 S.Ct. 255, 27 L.Ed.2d 254 (1970); Hutchison v. United States, 450 F.2d 930, 631 (10th Cir. 1971). 4. The defendant argues that his right to have a speedy trial under both Federal and State law was violated. He reli......
-
Conner v. Griffith
...Ind. 439, 24 N.E. 1047 (1890).6 See, e. g., United States ex rel. McGill v. Schubin, 475 F.2d 1257 (2nd Cir. 1973); Hutchison v. United States, 450 F.2d 930 (10th Cir. 1971); Sturgis v. United States, 419 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1969); Moore v. Smith, 412 F.2d 720 (7th Cir. 1969); Hamrick v. Pey......
-
People v. Pozo
...(1973) (institution of separate civil proceedings against defendant for commitment to a mental health facility); Hutchison v. United States, 450 F.2d 930, 931 (10th Cir.1971) (loss of good time credit); Waddy v. Davis, 445 F.2d 1 (5th Cir.1971) (disenfranchisement); United States v. Vermeul......
-
Ex parte Morrow
...mental health facility, Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent Institution, 475 F.2d at 1366; loss of good time credit, Hutchison v. United States, 450 F.2d 930, 931 (10th Cir.1971); possibility of imposition of consecutive sentences, United States v. Vermeulen, 436 F.2d 72, 75 (2nd Cir.1970), cert......
-
Rethinking the increased focus on penal measures in immigration law as reflected in the expansion of the "aggravated felony" concept.
...U.S. 580, 594 (1952). Collateral consequences are not a valid basis for withdrawing a guilty plea. See, e.g., Hutchinson v. United States, 450 F.2d 930, 931 (10th Cir. 1971) (holding that failure to advise a client that a plea will result in loss of good time credit does not render it inval......