Hynes v. Hynes, 72-1437
Decision Date | 15 May 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 72-1437,72-1437 |
Parties | Jimmy Gail HYNES, Appellant, v. James L. HYNES, Jr., Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Milton M. Ferrell, Miami, for appellant.
Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, CHARLES A. CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Appellant-wife takes this interlocutory appeal to review an order modifying a final judgment of divorce.
On March 15, 1971, the parties were divorced and appellee-husband was ordered to pay (1) the mortgage payments on the marital residence, (2) $25 per week alimony, and (3) $25 per week child support for each of three minor children, a total of approximately $133 each week. Appellant filed a contempt notice and a hearing thereon was held on May 23, 1972. Appellee-husband appeared without counsel. The court found the appellee-husband to be $4,100 in arrears as of May 19, 1972, but reserved entering its order thereupon. Thereafter, on June 1, 1972, appellee, having employed counsel, filed a Petition for Modification of Final Judgment of Divorce. A hearing was held on this petition on June 8, 1972. Immediately thereafter, the court signed its order on the notice of contempt previously heard on Mary 23, 1972. This order of June 8, 1972 found appellee-husband to be delinquent in his payments in the sum of $4,100. Nevertheless, the court advised it intended to rehear the matter. Thereafter, appellee filed a petition for rehearing or in the alternative for modification of final judgment of divorce and court order of June 8, 1972. On October 12, 1972 a hearing was held on appellee's petition. The record, however, does not reflect any testimony contesting the accuracy of the court's order of June 8, 1972 in finding the appellee to be delinquent in his payments as of May 19, 1972 in the sum of $4,100. Subsequently, on November 6, 1972 the court entered an order setting aside its order of June 8, 1972 and modifying the final judgment of divorce which reads in part as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Powell v. Smith, 86-1240
...the appellant in this court. Reversed and remanded with directions. 1 Teta v. Teta, 297 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Hynes v. Hynes, 277 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Petrucci v. Petrucci, 252 So.2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA ...
-
Smithwick v. Smithwick, 76--267
...as the trial court may determine to be appropriate or necessary. Feder v. Feder, 291 So.2d 641 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Hynes v. Hynes, 277 So.2d 557 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Petrucci v. Petrucci, 252 So.2d 867 (Fla.3d DCA 1971). In his brief Ollie takes no issue with this statement of the law, but con......
-
Ames v. Ames
...in such a manner as to affect or cancel past due installments. Benson v. Benson, 369 So.2d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Hynes v. Hynes, 277 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). The Florida Court of Appeals has specifically "The right of a wife to payment of alimony and child support in arrears is veste......
-
Teta v. Teta
...v. Gottesman, 220 So.2d 640 (Fla.App.3rd, 1969); Petrucci v. Petrucci, 252 So.2d 867 (Fla.App.3rd, 1971); and Hynes v. Hynes, 277 So.2d 557 (Fla.App.3rd, 1973). We recognize that in some cases there may be extraordinary facts (such as laches or estoppel, waiver, reprehensible conduct on the......