I.T. v. State, s. 92-947

Decision Date16 February 1993
Docket NumberNos. 92-947,92-1075,s. 92-947
Citation614 So.2d 582
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Parties18 Fla. L. Week. D507 I.T., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Roberta G. Mandel and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Winnie M. Jordan, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that, in the totality of the surrounding circumstances, the officer's plain view observation of a plastic baggy of a type uniquely used for narcotics sticking out of the respondent's pocket provided probable cause for his arrest and subsequent search. P.L.R. v. State, 455 So.2d 363 (Fla.1984); Cross v. State, 560 So.2d 228 (Fla.1990); Council v. State, 442 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Hence, the motion to suppress the drugs found in the bag was properly denied and the adjudication on appeal in case number 92-1075 is therefore affirmed.

The imposition, on a separate charge, of community control without sanctions, which is challenged by the state in case number 92-947, was admittedly not entered in conformance with sections 39.052; 39.054, Florida Statutes (1991), and is therefore vacated.

Affirmed, vacated.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Millets v. State, 94-3004
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 1995
    ...105 S.Ct. 1206, 84 L.Ed.2d 349 (1985); Elliott, 597 So.2d at 916; State v. Byham, 394 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); I.T. v. State, 614 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Council v. State, 442 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA Certainly, suspicious movement alone, in an otherwise innocent context, does n......
  • McNeil v. State, 98-2217.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 10, 1999
    ...in their mouth is insufficient to justify a search); see also Cummo v. State, 581 So.2d 967, 968 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); cf. I.T. v. State, 614 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (holding that officer's plain view observation of plastic baggie used for narcotics sticking out of defendant's pocket pro......
  • State v. F.G., s. 92-1440
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 10, 1993
    ...39.069(1)(b)(5), Florida Statutes (1991). The State contends that this court reached a contrary conclusion in I.T. v. State, 614 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We disagree. In I.T. the State specifically challenged the disposition as being illegal. 5 There, the trial court had placed an adju......
  • State v. KV, 4D01-3812.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 19, 2002
    ...of the baggie of marijuana wedged between the car seats provided additional probable cause to conduct the search. See I.T. v. State, 614 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (finding probable cause to search juvenile suspect after officer observed a plastic baggie protruding from his The order gran......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT