Icke's Marriage, In re

Decision Date15 September 1975
Docket NumberNo. C--628,C--628
Citation189 Colo. 319,540 P.2d 1076
PartiesIn re the MARRIAGE OF Lewis A. ICKE, Petitioner, and Genevieve Icke, Respondent.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

John A. Kintzele, James A. Dubee, Denver, for petitioner.

Macy & Boulter, Stuart L. Boulter, Northglenn, for respondent.

DAY, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review one aspect of a decision of the Court of Appeals in In re the Marriage of Icke, 35 Colo.App. 60, 530 P.2d 1001 (1974). The Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment of the trial court ordering, Inter alia, that life insurance be maintained by a parent obligated to pay child support. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Petitioner and respondent were granted a decree dissolving their marriage of nearly nineteen years' duration. The parties had three minor children at the time of the final hearing. As part of the district court's order concerning custody, property division, maintenance and child support, the petitioner was ordered to maintain a $10,000 life insurance policy with his minor children made beneficiaries. Prior to the decree, the respondent had been beneficiary under the policy.

The petitioner appealed the trial court's order regarding maintenance of the insurance policy, as well as property division, maintenance and payment of respondent's attorney's fees. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and we granted certiorari solely on the insurance issue.

This aspect of the Court of Appeals decision is at variance with our prior case law on the subject. In Laws v. Laws, 164 Colo. 80, 432 P.2d 632 (1967), we held that a trial court's power to order a non-custodial parent to support his minor children does not encompass the power to compel the parent to maintain life insurance policies with the children as beneficiaries. As the Court of Appeals points out, that case and others which followed were decided prior to the enactment of the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, under which the order in the present case was issued. 1971 Perm.Supp., C.R.S.1963, 46--1--1 Et seq. 1 Section 46--1--22(3) 2 states as follows:

'Unless otherwise agreed in writing or expressly provided in the decree, provisions for the support of a child are terminated by emancipation of the child But not by the death of a parent obligated to support the child. . . .' (Emphasis added.)

This statute effects a legislative abrogation of the common law that developed under the divorce statu...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Marriage of Ingels, In re
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 8 March 1979
    ...Carlson v. Carlson, 178 Colo. 283, 497 P.2d 1006 (1972); In re Marriage of Icke, 35 Colo.App. 60, 530 P.2d 1001 (1974), Aff'd, 189 Colo. 319, 540 P.2d 1076 (1975); See also In re Marriage of Corbin, Colo.App., 591 P.2d 1046 (1979). Wife has made no such showing Finally, wife argues that the......
  • Abrams v. Connolly, 88SC98
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 23 October 1989
    ...into a dissolution decree becomes a final money judgment "when it is due and not paid." 5 We acknowledged in Icke v. Icke, 189 Colo. 319, 540 P.2d 1076 (1975), that one of the effects of section 14-10-122(3), 6B C.R.S. (1987), is to invalidate our pre-UDMA decision in Laws v. Laws, 164 Colo......
  • Marriage of Ward, In re
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 20 July 1987
    ...In our view, the trial court's discretion extends to the amount of maintenance and the mode of payment. Cf. In re Marriage of Icke, 189 Colo. 319, 540 P.2d 1076 (1975) (maintenance of life insurance policy with minor children as beneficiaries is a reasonable means by which child support obl......
  • Lynn Lou Webb v. Terry Lee Webb
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 31 December 1997
    ... ... the domestic relations court issued a "FINAL DECREE OF ... DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE," dissolving the parties' ... marriage. The parties' separation agreement was ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Securing Future Child Support Obligations
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 51-1, January 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...[4] CRS § 14-10-118(2). [5] CRS § 14-14-109. [6] Abrams v. Connollly, 781 P.2d 651, 657 n.5 (Colo. 1989) (citing In re Marriage of Icke, 540 P.2d 1076 (Colo.App. 1975)). [7] CRS § 15-11-514. [8] CRS § 14-10-122(1)(a)-(b). [9] CRS § 14-10-115(13). [10] See CRS § 14-10-115. [11] Gonzales v. D......
  • Child Support Obligations After Death of the Supporting Parent
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 16-5, May 1987
    • Invalid date
    ...et seq. 3. CRS § 14-10-122(3). 4. Id. 5. See, e.g., Laws v. Laws, 432 P.2d 632 (1967); Menor v. Menor, 391 P.2d 473 (1964). 6. Inrelcke, 540 P.2d 1076 (Colo. 1975). 7. See, CRS § 14-10-115(3) to (16), for guidelines in effect for support decrees entered on or after November 1, 1986. See, CR......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT