Ikard v. Empire Guano Co.

Decision Date11 March 1937
Docket Number8 Div. 759
Citation233 Ala. 579,173 So. 87
PartiesIKARD v. EMPIRE GUANO CO.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; Paul Speake, Judge.

Bill in equity by the Empire Guano Company against Edd Ikard and another. From a decree overruling a demurrer to the bill as amended, the named respondent appeals.

Affirmed.

Edd Ikard, pro se.

Griffin & Ford, of Huntsville, for appellee.

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainant, a remote vendee, seeks reformation of a mortgage in his chain of title, executed by defendant Edd Ikard to J.S. Ikard, complainant's grantor, and the bill comes clearly within the influence of our statutes. Sections 6960-6962, Code, 1923; Woodlawn Realty & Development Co. v. Hawkins, 186 Ala. 234, 65 So. 183.

The bill as amended sufficiently avers the mutuality of the mistake (Eastis v. Beasley, 214 Ala. 651, 108 So. 763; Camper v. Rice, 201 Ala. 579, 78 So. 923; Warren v. Crow, 195 Ala. 568, 71 So. 92; National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Lassetter, 224 Ala. 649, 141 So. 645), or mistake of one party, the grantee, accompanied by fraud on the part of the other, the grantor ( Hand v. Cox, 164 Ala. 348, 51 So. 519; Snider v. J.E. Freeman & Co., 214 Ala. 295, 107 So. 815; Jones v. Johnston, 193 Ala. 265, 69 So. 427; Corley v. Vizard, 203 Ala. 564, 84 So. 299).

There was no error in overruling the demurrer to the amended bill, and the decree is accordingly here affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C.J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Gilmore v. Sexton
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1950
    ...half of said northwest quarter of southwest quarter of said section 31, instead of the east half thereof.' See, also, Ikard v. Empire Guano Co., 233 Ala. 579, 173 So. 87; O'Rear v. O'Rear, 219 Ala. 419, 122 So. 645; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Engel Realty Co., 241 Ala. 236, 2 So.2d......
  • Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Engel Realty Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1941
    ... ... American-Traders' National Bank v. Henderson, ... 222 Ala. 426, 133 So. 36; Ikard v. Empire Guano Co., ... 233 Ala. 579, 173 So. 87; Hand v. Cox, 164 Ala. 348, ... 51 So. 519; 23 ... ...
  • Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Cherry
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1937
  • Skelton v. Tyner
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1946
    ... ... 892; Woodlawn Realty & Development ... Co. v. Hawkins et al., 186 Ala. 234, 65 So. 183; Ikard v ... Empire Guano Co., 233 Ala. 579, 173 So. 87 ... This ... contention by ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT