Impastato v. Village of Catskill
| Decision Date | 09 February 1978 |
| Citation | 43 N.Y.2d 888,403 N.Y.S.2d 497 |
| Parties | , 374 N.E.2d 394 Procopio Salvatore IMPASTATO et al., Respondents, v. The VILLAGE OF CATSKILL, New York, et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (55 A.D.2d 714, 389 N.Y.S.2d 152).
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
Brandon v. Town of Se.
...843, 843–844, 649 N.Y.S.2d 274 ; see also Impastato v. Village of Catskill, 55 A.D.2d 714, 715, 389 N.Y.S.2d 152, affd. 43 N.Y.2d 888, 403 N.Y.S.2d 497, 374 N.E.2d 394 ). In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact.The defendants' remaining contention is not proper......
-
In the Matter of Ronald Marchand v. N.Y. State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation
...A.D.2d 789, 790–791, 533 N.Y.S.2d 316, citing Impastato v. Village of Catskill, 55 A.D.2d 714, 389 N.Y.S.2d 152, affd. 43 N.Y.2d 888, 403 N.Y.S.2d 497, 374 N.E.2d 394). “In addition to a finding of use by the public, ‘there must also be a finding that the road has been kept in repair or tak......
-
Pinsly v. Town of Huntington
...843, 843-844, 649 N.Y.S.2d 274; see also Impastato v. Village of Catskill, 55 A.D.2d 714, 715, 389 N.Y.S.2d 152, affd. 43 N.Y.2d 888, 403 N.Y.S.2d 497, 374 N.E.2d 394). In opposition, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324,......
-
Gardner v. Suddaby
... ... trial court's finding that the disputed road had become a public Town highway (Compare Impastato v. Village of Catskill, 55 A.D.2d 714, 389 N.Y.S.2d 152, affd. 43 N.Y.2d 888, 403 N.Y.S.2d 497, 374 ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results