In-error v. Friedman, 16.
| Decision Date | 29 January 1948 |
| Docket Number | No. 16.,16. |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Defendant-in-Error, v. Louis FRIEDMAN, also known as ‘Label’ Friendman, Plaintiff-in-Error. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error to Supreme Court.
Edward I. Feinberg, of Atlantic City (Isaac C. Ginsburg, of Atlantic City, of counsel), for plaintiff-in-error.
Lewis P. Scott, of Atlantic City (David R. Brone, of Atlantic City, of counsel), for defendant-in-error.
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court. 135 N.J.L. 419, 52 A.2d 416.
For affirmance: THE CHANCELLOR, Justices BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, and BURLING, and Judges WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN and SCHETTINO-11.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
12 cases
-
State v. Laws
... ... See State v. Friedman, 135 N.J.L. 419, 421, 52 A.2d 416 (Sup.Ct.1947), aff'd 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d 390 (E. & A. 1948); Pearlman v. United States, 9 Cir., 20 F.2d 113, ... ...
-
State v. Witte
... ... Compare State v. Friedman, 135 N.J.L. 419, 52 A.2d 416 (Sup.Ct.1947), affirmed 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d 390 (E. & A.1948) ... The indictment charges with a ... ...
-
State v. Brown
... ... Friedman, 135 N.J.L. 419, 421, 52 A.2d 416 (Sup.Ct.1947), affirmed 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d 390 (E. & A. 1948) ... There are two essential ... ...
-
Fisher v. Neusser
...516, 533, 280 A.2d 55, 65, quoting State v. Friedman (1947), 135 N.J.L. 419, 420-421, 52 A.2d 416, 418, affirmed State v. Friedman (1948), 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d 390. The scope of the term "investment" is ultimately determined by how it is defined in R.C. 5701.06. However, since R.C. 5701.......
Request a trial to view additional results