In-error v. Friedman, 16.

Citation57 A.2d 390,136 N.J.L. 634
Decision Date29 January 1948
Docket NumberNo. 16.,16.
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Defendant-in-Error, v. Louis FRIEDMAN, also known as ‘Label’ Friendman, Plaintiff-in-Error.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Error to Supreme Court.

Edward I. Feinberg, of Atlantic City (Isaac C. Ginsburg, of Atlantic City, of counsel), for plaintiff-in-error.

Lewis P. Scott, of Atlantic City (David R. Brone, of Atlantic City, of counsel), for defendant-in-error.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court. 135 N.J.L. 419, 52 A.2d 416.

For affirmance: THE CHANCELLOR, Justices BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, and BURLING, and Judges WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN and SCHETTINO-11.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Laws, A--148
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • 25 Septiembre 1967
    ...... See State v. Friedman, 135 N.J.L. 419, 421, 52 A.2d 416 (Sup.Ct.1947), aff'd 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d 390 (E. & A. 1948); Pearlman v. United States, 9 Cir., 20 F.2d 113, ......
  • State v. Witte, A--18
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • 23 Noviembre 1953
    ...... Compare State v. Friedman, 135 N.J.L. 419, 52 A.2d 416 (Sup.Ct.1947), affirmed 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d 390 (E. & A.1948). .         The indictment charges with a ......
  • State v. Brown, A--707
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 12 Mayo 1961
    ......Friedman, 135 N.J.L. 419, 421, 52 A.2d 416 (Sup.Ct.1947), affirmed 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d 390 (E. & A. 1948).         There are two essential ......
  • Fisher v. Neusser, 94-1907
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • 14 Febrero 1996
    ...533, 280 A.2d 55, 65, quoting State v. Friedman (1947), 135 N.J.L. 419, 420-421, 52 A.2d 416, 418, affirmed State v. Friedman (1948), 136 N.J.L. 634, 57 A.2d The scope of the term "investment" is ultimately determined by how it is defined in R.C. 5701.06. However, since R.C. 5701.06 is incl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT