In Re Advisory Opinion, in Re

Citation43 Fla. 305,31 So. 348
PartiesIn re ADVISORY OPINION.
Decision Date08 October 1901
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Under F.S.A. Const. art. 9, § 4, providing that no money shall be drawn from the treasury, except in pursuance of an appropriation made by law, a joint resolution, adopted by both houses of the Legislature, without an enacting clause is insufficient for that purpose.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

An appropriation of public money cannot be constitutionally made by a joint resolution adopted by both houses of the legislature that lacks the constitutionally prescribed requisite to make it a law of an enacting clause.

OPINION

Advisory Opinion to Governor.

In the matter of the communication of the 4th of October, A. D 1901. To His Excellency, William S. Jennings,

Governor of Florida.

Sir:--We are in receipt of your communication of the fourth instant as follows:

'Oct. 4, 1901.
'To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida--Gentlemen:--A joint resolution was passed by the legislature of Florida of 1901 authorizing the acceptance of a donation to the Florida Agricultural College of $10,000 for the erection of a gymnasium, and appropriating the sum of $2,500, or such part of that sum as may be necessary, for equipping said gymnasium in accordance with the terms of the donation as stated in the preamble and joint resolution which was approved May 3, 1901, and numbered 9. The comptroller has this day submitted for my signature and approval a warrant in payment of a sum under this appropriation.
'The fourth section of article 9 of the state constitution reads: 'No money shall be drawn from the treasury except in pursuance of an appropriation made by law.' I am in doubt as to the sufficiency and legality of said joint resolution as an appropriation of money to be drawn from the treasury under the provisions of the constitution of the state of Florida, and as to may powers and duties to countersign said warrant, and now request your honors' opinion upon this point, so that I may be certain as to my executive powers and duties in the premises.
'I have the honor to remain, yours very truly,
'W. S. Jennings, Governor of Florida.'

The resolution adopted by the legislature of 1901, to which you refer, is as follows:

'A joint resolution authorizing the acceptance of a donation to Florida Agricultural

College, and appropriating money for the equipping of such gymnasium.

'Whereas, Henry M. Flagler, in a letter to Hon. Geo. W. Wilson, president of the board of trustees of Florida Agricultural College, says: 'May information is that you are badly in want of a gymnasium at this college, and I shall be happy to contribute the sum of ten thousand dollars to a building for such a purpose, provided the state of Florida will contribute an amount to properly equip such an institution:' Therefore,

'Resolved by the senate, the house of representatives concurring, that the board of trustees of the Florida Agricultural College is hereby authorized to accept the said donation for the erection of a building for a gymnasium, and that the sum of twenty-five hundred dollars, or so much thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated to properly equip such an institution in accordance with the terms of the donation.

'Approved May 3, 1901.'

In short, the question submitted by you for our solution is whether or not this resolution effects, under our constitution, a legal appropriation of the sum of money therein mentioned, so as to authorize you, as governor, to countersign a warrant on the public treasury therefor. Section 4 of article 9 of the constitution of 1885, provides that 'no money shall be drawn from the treasury except in pursuance of appropriations made by law.'

And section 24 of article 4, provides that: 'The treasurer shall receive and keep all funds, bonds, and other securities, in such manner as may be prescribed by law, and shall disburse no funds, nor issue bonds, or other securities, except upon the order of the comptroller countersigned by the governor, in such manner as shall be prescribed by law.'

And section 18 of article 4 provides that: 'The governor shall have power to disapprove of any item or items of any bills making appropriations of money embracing distinct items, and the part or parts of the bill approved shall be the law, and the item or items of appropriation disapproved shall be void, unless repassed according to the rules and limitations...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • State ex rel. Robinson v. Fluent
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 18 de março de 1948
    ... ... its investigatory function into the interim and until the ... next session of the legislature is foreclosed by our opinion ... in State ex rel. Hamblen v. Yelle, Wash., 185 P.2d ... 723, in which we held that by statute a legislative committee ... may ... 54, 184 ... A. 89 ... In ... January, 1947, the legislature of Alabama requested an ... advisory opinion of the supreme court of that state as to the ... constitutionality of a resolution pending Before the ... committee proposing to ... ...
  • State v. Allen
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 10 de fevereiro de 1922
    ...money shall be drawn from the treasury except in pursuance of appropriations made by law' (section 4, art. 9, Const.; In re Advisory Opinion, 43 Fla. 305, 31 So. 348), and that the State Treasurer 'shall disburse no funds * except upon the order of Comptroller countersigned by the Governor,......
  • City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & Son
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 5 de abril de 1938
    ... ... Sinclair, of Winter Haven, for appellants ... Touchton ... & Crittenden, of Winter Haven, for appellee ... OPINION ... Statement ... by WHITFIELD, Justice ... The ... Constitution of Florida contains the following: ... 'The ... clause prescribed by section 15, article 3, is a prime ... essential to the validity of a law. In re Advisory ... Opinion, 43 Fla. 305, 31 So. 348 ... Statutes ... that are not patently and indubitably void or ... unconstitutional on their face ... ...
  • State ex rel. Hynds v. Cahill
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 18 de fevereiro de 1904
    ...17. Cal. --Railroad Tax Cases, 8 Sawy., 238; Paving Co. v. Hilton, 69 Cal. 479. Colo. --In re House Bill, 26 Colo. 234. Fla. --In re Advisory Opinion, 31 So. 348. --Protho v. Orr, 12 Ga. 36; Harper v. Elberton, 23 Ga. 566. Id. --Cohn v. Kingsley, 38 L. R. A., 74; Brown v. Collister, 51 P. 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT