In re Alexandra J.

Decision Date01 October 2010
Citation77 A.D.3d 1299,907 N.Y.S.2d 763
PartiesIn the Matter of ALEXANDRA J., Daniel J., and Parker J. Erie County Department of Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Paulette C., Respondent-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

William D. Broderick, Jr., Elma, for Respondent-Appellant.

Joseph T. Jarzembek, Buffalo, for Petitioner-Respondent.

Mindy L. Marranca, Attorney for the Children, Buffalo, for Alexandra J., Daniel J., and Parker J.

PRESENT: MARTOCHE, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND GREEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, respondent mother appeals from an order adjudicating the three children at issue to be neglected children. Contrary to the mother's contention, the finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence ( see § 1046 [b][i] ). The evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing demonstrated thatthe mother attempted to commit suicide by overdosing on prescription medication, causing her to lose consciousness for a prolonged period of time. The mother was not conscious when the children returned to her house following weekend visitation with their father, and the children were unable to wake her the next morning when they needed a ride to school. The mother eventually awoke later that morning but did not drive the children to school because she was physically unable to operate a motor vehicle. School officials subsequently came to the house to transport the children to school, and the mother was admitted that day to the psychiatric ward of a local hospital, where she stayed for five days. We conclude that, because of her voluntarily-induced drug stupor, the mother failed to provide the children with "proper supervision or guardianship" (§ 1012[f][i][B]; see e.g. Matter of Stephon Elijah G., 63 A.D.3d 640, 881 N.Y.S.2d 426; Matter of Ifeiye O., 53 A.D.3d 501, 861 N.Y.S.2d 133) and, as a result, the children's physical, mental and emotional condition was in imminent danger of becoming impaired ( see § 1012[f][i] ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT