In re Amendments to Fla. Family Law Rules Procedure, SC16–978
Decision Date | 16 March 2017 |
Docket Number | No. SC16–978,SC16–978 |
Citation | 214 So.3d 400 (Mem) |
Parties | IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Judge Laurel Moore Lee, Chair, Family Law Rules Committee, Plant City, Florida; Charles Cole Jeffries, Jr., Past Chair, Family Law Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida; and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Krys Godwin, Bar Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner
Sarah E. Kay, Co–Chair, Rules and Forms Committee, Family Law Section of The Florida Bar, Sessums Black Caballero Ficarrotta, Tampa, Florida; C. Debra Welch, Co–Chair, Rules and Forms Committee, Family Law Section of The Florida Bar, The Law Firm of C. Debra Welch PA, West Palm Beach, Florida; Laura Davis Smith, Chair, Family Law Section of The Florida Bar, Greene Smith & Associates, P.A., Coral Gables, Florida; Thomas J. Sasser, Jorge M. Cestero, Peter J. Trombadore, and Trisha P. Armstrong of Sasser, Cestero & Sasser, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida; and Gregory Firestone, Ph.D., Sarasota, Florida, Responding with Comments
This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Forms. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
The Family Law Rules Committee (Committee) has filed an out-of-cycle report recommending the Court adopt multiple amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure to create a stand-alone set of rules to govern family law proceedings. The Committee also proposes amendments to several family law forms and proposes several new family law forms. All of the rule and form amendments were approved by the full Committee and the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar.
The Family Law Rules were first adopted by the Court in 1995. See In re Family Law Rules of Procedure , 663 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 1995). The Committee in that case initially proposed stand-alone rules that incorporated the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure into the Family Law Rules and also included rules unique to family law proceedings. However, at that time, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar took the position that the Family Law Rules should reference the civil rules where necessary rather than totally incorporate them with significant changes. Id. at 1048. The Court agreed with this position. Although the Court found the Committee's stand-alone approach to the new rules "well intended," it determined that putting the text of the civil rules, with stylistic and substantive changes, into the new rules "would make it difficult for general practitioners to easily discern what differences existed between the civil rules and the family law rules and what changes were in fact substantive and what changes were only stylistic." Id. at 1047. Thus, the Court modified the Committee's proposals "to require that the civil rules apply to family law matters except as set forth in the family law rules." Id. at 1048. The modified rules were adopted by the Court, with some revisions after further comment, and made effective January 1, 1996. See id. at 1049.
At present, the Board of Governors has unanimously voted to approve the proposed amendments in this case, and only three comments were filed in response to the Court's publication of the proposed amendments—only one of which opposes the stand-alone concept. Further, the Committee explains in its report:
The Committee also contends that a stand-alone rule set will be helpful and less confusing for pro se litigants in that for most issues they will not have to consult multiple sets of rules for guidance. Given the developments in the practice of marital and family law, the benefit to pro se litigants, and the Board's support for the proposals, we agree that consideration of a stand-alone set of rules for family law cases is warranted.
Prior to submission to the Court, the Committee published its proposals for comment in the August 1, 2015, edition of The Florida Bar News . Comments were received from several attorneys, a general magistrate, and the Family Law Section of The Florida Bar (Section). After consideration of the comments addressing specific rules, the Committee made further revisions to the proposed amendments. The rules that were amended in response to the comments received were then republished in the October 15, 2015, edition of The Florida Bar News . No additional comments were received in response to the second publication of the proposed rule amendments.
After the report was submitted to the Court, the proposals were again published for comment. Comments were received from the Section, Gregory Firestone, Ph.D., and the law firm of Sasser, Cestero & Sasser, P.A. The Committee filed a response to the comments.
Upon consideration of the report, the Committee's proposals, the comments, and the Committee's response thereto, we adopt the proposed rule amendments creating a stand-alone set of Family Law Rules of Procedure, with several modifications. Those modifications, as well as several issues and concerns raised by the comments filed, are discussed below.1
First, the proposed amendment to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.110 (General Rules of Pleading), in part, adds new subdivision (c) pertaining to verification of documents. As proposed, new subdivision (c)(1) would provide the statement to be included when verification is done in an individual capacity, and new subdivision (c)(2) would provide the statement to be included when verification is done in a representative capacity on behalf of a corporate entity. One of the comments filed takes issue with this proposed new provision pertaining to verification, specifically, the provision containing the oath to be given when a document is verified in a representative capacity. This provision is not contained in current Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110, and the Committee does not explain the source of the wording it proposes. Accordingly, we decline to adopt this particular portion of the proposed amendment to this rule.
Next, the proposed amendments to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.210 (Parties), in part, create a new subdivision (b) incorporating the provisions of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.210 and stating that the "court shall have the discretion to appoint a guardian ad litem and/or attorney ad litem for a minor, incapacitated, or incompetent person not otherwise represented in an action or shall make such other order as it deems proper for the protection of the minor, incapacitated, or incompetent person." A comment filed pertaining to this proposal raised the concern that this language is contrary to section 61.401, Florida Statutes (2016), and case law, noting that in some circumstances, appointment of a guardian ad litem is mandatory. See Turnier v. Stockman , 139 So.3d 397, 400 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ( ).
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.210(b), currently applicable in family law proceedings, provides in part that the court "shall appoint a guardian ad litem for a minor or incompetent person not otherwise represented in an action or shall make such other order as it deems proper for the protection of the minor or incompetent person." Although this provision uses the term "shall," appointment of a guardian ad litem under this rule has been construed as being discretionary in nature. Tallahassee Mem'l Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Petersen , 920 So.2d 75, 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Thus, by changing this provision from "shall appoint" to "shall have the discretion to appoint," the Committee has not changed its meaning. Further, courts applying this rule have recognized that although the rule is discretionary, other specific statutes and rules may require appointment of a guardian ad litem under certain circumstances. As pointed out by the comment, section 61.401, Florida Statutes (2016), provides:
In an action for dissolution of marriage or for the creation, approval, or modification of a parenting plan, if the court finds it is in the best interest of the child, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem to act as next friend of the child, investigator or evaluator, not as attorney or advocate. The court in its discretion may also appoint legal counsel for a child to act as attorney or advocate; however, the guardian and the legal counsel shall not be the same person. In such actions which involve an allegation of child abuse, abandonment, or neglect as defined in s. 39.01, which allegation is verified and determined by the court to be well-founded, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Oldham v. Greene
...Court adopted a more comprehensive rule related to examinations in the family law context. See In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure , 214 So.3d 400, 407 (Fla. 2017). Formerly, rule 12.360 simply referred to the rule of civil procedure, 1.360, that permitted examination ......
-
Varchetti v. Varchetti
...Family Law Rules of Procedure to create a "stand-alone" set of rules for family law proceedings. See In re Amendments to Fla. Family Law Rules of Procedure , 214 So. 3d 400, 400 (Fla. 2017). The supreme court noted that when the Family Law Rules were first adopted in 1995, the Family Law Ru......
-
Jean v. Jean
...Rules of Civil Procedure in a way that is no longer required following amendments to rule 12 in 2017. See In re Amendments to Fla. Fam. L. R. of P., 214 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 2017). Nevertheless, the language of rule 12.490 expressly requires that a mandatory hearing occur in family law proceedi......
-
Juhl v. Juhl
...rules to govern family law proceedings," no longer dependent on the civil rules for their underpinnings. See In re Amends. to Fla. Fam. L. R. P. , 214 So. 3d 400, 400 (Fla. 2017). The court struck from rule 12.020 the language that had incorporated the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See ......
-
Enforcement of orders and judgments
...to be deposited and withdrawn by order of court. [Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.600; In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure , 214 So. 3d 400, 465 (Fla. 2017); Moroni v. Fisher, 647 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (rule authorizing court to order deposit into its registry contemplat......
-
Family law proceedings and grounds
...enforcement of dissolution judgment); see also Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.605; In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure , 214 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 2017).] The basic elements for a temporary injunction are: • The inadequacy of a remedy at law. • The likelihood of irreparable injury i......
-
Final judgment; rehearing; motions related to judgment
...R. Civ. P. 1.530 and 1.540, extending filing of motion from 10 to 15 days); In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure , 214 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 2017).] If the final judgment of dissolution of marriage contains a transfer of real property or a judgment lien under a money judgmen......
-
Jurisdiction and venue
...Florida Supreme Court implemented stand alone Family Law Rules of Procedure. [In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, 214 So. 3d 400 (Fla. 2017).] Family law attorneys no longer follow Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. FORM See Digital Access for: • Form 6:10, Motion to D......