In re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Fla. Bar—Rules 11-1.3 & 11-1.9 (Biennial Petition), SC16–1963

Citation214 So.3d 1232 (Mem)
Decision Date13 April 2017
Docket NumberNo. SC16–1963,SC16–1963
Parties IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO the RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR—RULES 11–1.3 AND 11–1.9 (BIENNIAL PETITION).
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

214 So.3d 1232 (Mem)

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO the RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR—RULES 11–1.3 AND 11–1.9 (BIENNIAL PETITION).

No. SC16–1963

Supreme Court of Florida.

[April 13, 2017]


John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, William J. Schifino, Jr., President, Michael J. Higer, President-elect, Gordon J. Glover, Young Lawyers Division President 2015–16, Lori S. Holcomb, Director, Division of Ethics and Consumer Protection, and Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Bar

214 So.3d 1233

Rules). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar (Bar) has filed its biennial petition proposing amendments to Bar Rules 11–1.3 (Requirements and Limitations) and 11–1.9 (Continuation of Practice Program After Completion of Law School Program or Graduation), regarding certified legal interns. Pursuant to Bar Rule 1–12.1(g), the Bar published formal notice of its intent to file a petition recommending these amendments in The Florida Bar News . This notice was published on September 1, 2016, and allowed interested persons thirty days after the filing of the Bar's petition to provide comments to the Court. No comments were filed with the Court.

BACKGROUND

In September 2003, The Florida Bar's Special Board Committee to Study the Law School Practice Program (Committee) undertook the task of reviewing and studying Chapter 11 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar for the purpose of suggesting possible amendments to the rules governing the Law School Practice Program in order to address certain perceived shortcomings. See In re Amends. to R. Regulating Fla. Bar re Chapter 11 Task Force , 964 So.2d 690 (Fla. 2007). In June 2005, the Committee submitted three proposed revisions to Chapter 11 to the Court for its consideration, one of which was a proposal to amend rules 11–1.3 and 11–1.9 to require law school students and graduates wishing to participate in a certified legal intern program to apply for admission to The Florida Bar and obtain a letter of initial clearance as to character and fitness from the Florida Board of Bar Examiners as a prerequisite to participation. Id. at 691. At that time, multiple comments were filed opposing this change; however, the Florida Board of Bar Examiners supported the amendments. Ultimately, the Court adopted a modified version of the proposal which required registration as a certified legal intern registrant and receipt of a "letter of clearance as to character and fitness from the Florida Board of Bar Examiners." Id. at 692. This change was applied prospectively only to law school students entering a law school practice program on August 1, 2008, or later. Id. at 694. In its opinion, the Court stated:

Under the current versions of rules 11–1.3(a) and 11–1.9(b), the analysis of an applicant's character and fitness has been the responsibility of the applicant's law school dean and the agency or office where the applicant applies to serve. In the past, this has led to a wide disparity in the quality and quantity of the background investigations conducted and very serious problems. Not surprisingly, this resulted in some persons being approved for participation who, because of disqualifying or other negative incidents in the past, should not have
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Amendments To Rules Regulating The Florida Bar 11-1.3 & 11-1.4.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 27, 2022
    ...designed to determine issues of character and fitness for the practice of law." In re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, 214 So.3d 1232, 1234 (Fla. 2017) (quoting In re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, 964 So.2d 690, 692 (2007)). Accordingly, we amend the Rules R......
  • In re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Fla. Bar 11-1.3 & 11-1.4
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 27, 2022
    ...investigations designed to determine issues of character and fitness for the practice of law." In re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar , 214 So. 3d 1232, 1234 (Fla. 2017) (quoting In re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar , 964 So. 2d 690, 692 (2007) ).Accordingly, w......
  • In re Amendments To Rules Regulating The Florida Bar 11-1.3 & 11-1.4.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 27, 2022
    ... ... See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const ... To ... assist ... ...
  • Sells v. CSX Transp., Inc., SC15–1639
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 13, 2017
    ...214 So.3d 1232 (Mem)Crystal SELLS, etc., Petitioner,v.CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Respondent.No. SC15–1639Supreme Court of Florida.[April 13, 2017]John S. Mills and Andrew D. Manko of The Mills Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for PetitionerAndrew J. Knight, II, of Moseley Prichard Parrish K......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT