In re Amendments to Fla. Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530

Decision Date25 August 2022
Docket NumberSC22-756
Citation346 So.3d 1161 (Mem)
Parties IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.530 and Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.530.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

On its own motion, the Court amends Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530 (Motions for New Trial and Rehearing; Amendments of Judgments) and Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.530 (Motions for New Trial and Rehearing; Amendments of Judgments). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(d).

We have determined that amendments to these rules are necessary to clarify that filing a motion for rehearing is required to preserve an objection to insufficient trial court findings in a final judgment order. Thus, the following sentence is added to rules 1.530(a) and 12.530(a): "To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court's findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule." Additionally, we add the following Court Commentary to both rules: "The amendment to subdivision (a) does not address or affect, by negative implication, any other instance in which a motion for rehearing is or might be necessary to preserve an issue for appellate review."

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring. The amendments shall become effective immediately upon the issuance of this opinion. Because the amendments were not published for comment previously, interested persons shall have seventy-five days from the date of this opinion in which to file comments with the Court.1

It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

RULE 1.530. MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL AND REHEARING; AMENDMENTS OF JUDGMENTS

(a) Jury and Non-Jury Actions. A new trial may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or a part of the issues. To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court's findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule. On a motion for a rehearing of matters heard without a jury, including summary judgments, the court may open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, and enter a new judgment.

(b)(g) [NO CHANGE]

Committee Notes

[NO CHANGE]

Court Commentary

1984 Amendment. [NO CHANGE]

2022 Amendments. The amendment to subdivision (a) does not address or affect, by negative implication, any other instance in which a motion for rehearing is or might be necessary to preserve an issue for appellate review.

FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE

RULE 12.530. MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL AND REHEARING; AMENDMENTS OF JUDGMENTS

(a) Jury and Non-Jury Actions. A new trial or rehearing may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or a part of the issues. To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court's findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule. On a motion for a rehearing of matters heard without a jury, including summary judgments, the court may open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony, and enter a new judgment.

(b)(h) [NO CHANGE]

Court Commentary

2022 Amendments. The amendment to subdivision (a) does not address or affect, by negative implication, any other instance in which a motion for rehearing is or might be necessary to preserve an issue for appellate...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Jackson v. City of South Bay
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 15 Febrero 2023
    ...the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule."); In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530, 346 So.3d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 2022) (recognizing that the amendment to rule 1.530 clarified existing law). [2] Jackson also claims a Sunshine Law violation fo......
  • McGill v. McGill
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 10 Febrero 2023
    ...to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.530, 346 So.3d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 2022). Because the amendment was not effective until August 25, 2022, see id. at 1161-62, a motion for rehearing was required to preserve for review the issue of the lack of findings in the judgment rendered on January 13, 2022. W......
  • In re Amendments to Fla. Rules of Civil Procedure 1.530 & 1.535
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 25 Agosto 2022
    ... ... "15 days after entry of the judgment," in subdivisions (d) and (g), is replaced with "15 days after the date of filing of the judgment." As for rule 1.535, because the provisions of that rule deal entirely with motions filed in connection with the procedures set forth in rule 1.530, the text of ... ...
  • McGill v. McGill
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 10 Febrero 2023
    ...in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule." In Re: Amends. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.530 , 346 So. 3d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 2022). Because the amendment was not effective until August 25, 2022, see id. at 1161-62, a motion for rehearing was......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT