In re Anderson
Decision Date | 25 March 1941 |
Citation | 117 F.2d 939 |
Parties | In re ANDERSON. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Ernest J. Anderson, in pro per.
No other appearance entered.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.
Application for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus in forma pauperis in this court is denied because without merit for two reasons: One, our power as a court to issue such writs is in aid of our appellate jurisdiction only. De Maurez v. Swope, 100 F.2d 530; Ferguson v. Swope, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 152; De Maurez v. Swope, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 564. Two, the lower federal courts should not consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus where the petitioner is detained under state process save in exceptional cases. Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U.S. 179, 27 S.Ct. 459, 51 L.Ed. 760; Ex parte Melendez, 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 791; Ex parte Penney, 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 27; Ex parte Jefferson, 9 Cir., 106 F.2d 471.
This is not such a case.
Application denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hawk v. Olson
...2 Cir., 108 F.2d 861, certiorari denied, Murphy v. Warden of Clinton State Prison, 309 U.S. 661, 60 S.Ct. 583, 84 L.Ed. 1009; In re Anderson, 9 Cir., 117 F.2d 939; Id., 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 750; Gebhart v. Amrine, 10 Cir., 117 F.2d 995; Achtien v. Dowd, 7 Cir., 117 F. 2d 989, 994, 995; Davis v.......
-
Application of Middlebrooks
...detained under State process, except in rare cases where exceptional circumstances of peculiar urgency are shown to exist. In re Anderson, 9 Cir., 1941, 117 F.2d 939; Hawk v. Olson, 8 Cir., 1942, 130 F.2d 910, see cases collected at page 911. But in Ex parte Hawk, 1944, 321 U.S. 114, at pag......
-
Ex parte Hawk. No. —
...cases where exceptional circumstances of peculiar urgency are shown to exist.' (269 U.S. 13, 46 S.Ct. 3, 70 L.Ed. 138). See In re Anderson, 9 Cir., 117 F.2d 939, 940; In re Miller, 9 Cir., 126 F.2d 826, 827; Kelly v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 129 F.2d 811, 814, 815; Hawk v. Olson, supra, 130 F.2d 911—......
-
Mason v. Webb, 10431.
...614, 60 S.Ct. 264, 84 L.Ed. 513; Ex parte Jefferson, 9 Cir., 106 F.2d 471, 472; Frach v. Mass, 9 Cir., 106 F.2d 820, 821; In re Anderson, 9 Cir., 117 F.2d 939, 940; Id., 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 750, 751; Kramer v. State of Nevada, 9 Cir., 122 F.2d 417, 419; Hogue v. Duffy, Warden, 9 Cir., 124 F.2d......