In re Anthem-Cigna Merger Litig.
Decision Date | 31 August 2020 |
Docket Number | Consolidated C.A. No. 2017-0114-JTL |
Parties | IN RE ANTHEM-CIGNA MERGER LITIGATION |
Court | Court of Chancery of Delaware |
William M. Lafferty, Kevin M. Coen, D. McKinley Measley, Zi-Xiang Shen, Thomas P. Will, Daniel T. Menken, MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Glenn M. Kurtz, Claudine Columbres, Andrew W. Hammond, Gregory Starner, Camille M. Shepherd, Vatsala Sahay, WHITE & CASE LLP, New York, New York; Heather M. Burke, WHITE & CASE LLP, Palo Alto, California; Dana E. Foster, WHITE & CASE LLP, Washington, D.C.; Attorneys for Anthem, Inc.
David E. Ross, Garrett B. Moritz, S. Michael Sirkin, Adam D. Gold, Benjamin Z. Grossberg, Anne M. Steadman, ROSS ARONSTAM & MORITZ LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Stephen R. DiPrima, William Savitt, Graham W. Meli, Adam M. Gogolak, Lauren M. Kofke, S. Christopher Szczerban, Steven P. Winter, Claire E. Addis, Bita Assad, Daniel H. Rosenblum, Jacob Miller, Jeohn Salone Favors, WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ, New York, NY; Attorneys for Cigna Corporation.
LASTER, V.C.
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 8
1. The Non-Public Negotiations ...................................................................... 27
2. Anthem's Bear Hug Letter .......................................................................... 30
3. The Management Meetings ......................................................................... 32
4. The Agreement In Principle ........................................................................ 36
5. The Struggle Over Cordani's Role As COO ............................................... 37
6. The Parties' Understandings Regarding The Blues Rules .......................... 40
1. Stockholder Approval .................................................................................. 44
2. Regulatory Approval ................................................................................... 45
1. The First Months Of Integration Planning .................................................. 54
2. The L2/L3 Selection Dispute ...................................................................... 56
3. The Dispute Letters ..................................................................................... 58
4. The Meeting On January 11, 2016 .............................................................. 61
5. The Cigna ELT's Response ......................................................................... 63
6. Preparations For The February 16 Meeting ................................................ 65
7. The February 16 Meeting ............................................................................ 67
8. Cigna Escalates Further ............................................................................... 68
9. The De-Scoping Of The Integration Planning Process ............................... 74
10. The Status Of The Regulatory Approval Process ....................................... 75
1. Swedish Pushes Forward ............................................................................. 77
2. The Continued Impasse Over Integration Planning .................................... 78
3. The Cigna Board's March 31 Meeting ........................................................ 81
4. The Anthem Board Unsuccessfully Pursues Détente .................................. 84
5. Cigna Changes Its Disclosure ..................................................................... 87
1. The DOJ Update .......................................................................................... 89
2. The White Papers ........................................................................................ 90
3. Internal Integration Planning At Anthem .................................................... 94
4. Teneo Leaks The Dispute Letters To The Wall Street Journal ................ 100
5. Cigna Attempts To Re-Engage On Integration Planning .......................... 105
6. "Bias-to-Blue" As A Go-To-Market Strategy ........................................... 107
1. The June 10 Meeting With The Staff ........................................................ 110
2. The Remediation Effort ............................................................................. 112
3. The June 21 Meeting With The Front Office ............................................ 116
4. Cigna Continues To Analyze Its Standalone Options ............................... 122
1. The Parties' Initial Responses To The Antitrust Litigation ...................... 124
2. Cigna's Covert Communications Campaign ............................................. 126
3. The Initial Phase Of The Antitrust Litigation ........................................... 132
4. Discovery In The Antitrust Litigation ....................................................... 135
5. Pre-Trial Preparations ................................................................................ 138
6. Trial In The Antitrust Litigation ................................................................ 143
III. LEGAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 189
1. The Reasonable Best Efforts Covenant ..................................................... 193
2. The Regulatory Efforts Covenant ............................................................. 196
3. The Regulatory Cooperation Covenant ..................................................... 201
4. The No Injunction Condition .................................................................... 204
1. Cigna's Covert Communications Campaign Against The Merger ........... 205
2. Cigna's Withdrawal From Integration Planning ....................................... 212
3. Anthem's Claim Against Cigna For Obstructing A Divestiture ............... 234
4. Anthem's Claim Against Cigna For Resisting Mediation ........................ 246
5. Cigna's Undermining Of Anthem's Defense In The Antitrust Litigation 251
1. The National Accounts Issue ..................................................................... 264
2. The Local Markets Issues .......................................................................... 270
3. Other Regulatory Approvals ..................................................................... 272
4. Judgment In Favor Of Cigna ..................................................................... 273
1. Cigna's Claim Regarding The Blues Rules ............................................... 273
2. Cigna's Claim Regarding The $704 Million In Efficiencies .................... 288
3. The Effect-Of-Termination Provision ....................................................... 289
4. Judgment In Favor Of Anthem .................................................................. 293
To continue reading
Request your trial