In re Antonio T.

Decision Date06 February 2019
Docket NumberDocket Nos. N-6688-16, N-6689-16, N-6690-16, N-6691-16, N-6692-16, N-6693-16, N-6694-16, N-15169-16,2017-12130,2017-12131
Parties In the MATTER OF ANTONIO T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Quincy J. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) In the Matter of Diamond J. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 3) In the Matter of Emani T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 4) In the Matter of Xavier J. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 5) In the Matter of Anisha J. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 6) In the Matter of Destiney J. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 7) In the Matter of Omari T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 8)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

169 A.D.3d 699
93 N.Y.S.3d 369

In the MATTER OF ANTONIO T. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Quincy J. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 2)

In the Matter of Diamond J. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 3)

In the Matter of Emani T. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 4)

In the Matter of Xavier J. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 5)

In the Matter of Anisha J. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 6)

In the Matter of Destiney J. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 7)

In the Matter of Omari T. (Anonymous).


Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent;

Franklin T. (Anonymous), Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
(Proceeding No. 8)

2017-12130
2017-12131
Docket Nos.
N-6688-16, N-6689-16, N-6690-16, N-6691-16, N-6692-16, N-6693-16, N-6694-16, N-15169-16

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted—January 10, 2019
February 6, 2019


93 N.Y.S.3d 371

Steven P. Forbes, Jamaica, NY, for respondent-appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Devin Slack and Deborah E. Wassel of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Lesley J. Lanoix, Jamaica, NY, attorney for the children Antonio T., Emani T., Xavier J., and Omari T.

Eric Perlmutter, Jamaica, NY, attorney for the child Quincy J.

Maria V. de la Cruz, Jamaica, NY, attorney for the child Diamond J.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Dawne A. Mitchell and Diane Pazar of counsel), attorney for the child Anisha J.

Angela Starr, Massapequa Park, NY, attorney for the child Destiney J.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

169 A.D.3d 699

In eight related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Frank T. appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Queens County (Joan L. Piccirillo, J.), dated September 18, 2017, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated October 11, 2017. The order of fact-finding, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that the appellant sexually abused the children Anisha J. and Diamond J., derivatively abused the children Antonio T., Quincy J., Emani T., Xavier J., Destiney J., and Omari T., and neglected all of the children. The order of disposition, inter alia, directed the appellant to participate in a sex offender treatment program and to comply with orders of protection in favor of the children.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order of fact-finding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was

169 A.D.3d 700

superseded by the order of disposition and is brought up for review on the appeal from the order of disposition; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People v. Akbar
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 6, 2019
    ...721 N.Y.S.2d 49 ). Consequently, the judgment of conviction must be reversed, and a new trial ordered. Since we are remitting the matter 93 N.Y.S.3d 369for a new trial, we note that the Supreme Court should have submitted the requested charges of assault in the third degree, i.e., recklessl......
  • Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Jamie G. (In re Mariliz G.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 20, 2022
    ...the observations of the caseworker (see Matter of Alven V. [Ketly M.], 194 A.D.3d at 727, 143 N.Y.S.3d 577 ; Matter of Antonio T. [Franklin T.], 169 A.D.3d 699, 701, 93 N.Y.S.3d 369 ). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are entitled to deference (......
  • Westchester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Afroz Q.M. (In re Ivy R.Q.M.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 24, 2020
    ...living room carpet (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 124, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914 ; Matter of Antonio T. [Franklin T.], 169 A.D.3d 699, 700, 93 N.Y.S.3d 369 ; Matter of Arique D. [Elizabeth A.], 111 A.D.3d 625, 627, 975 N.Y.S.2d 82 ). To the extent the father's testimony cont......
  • Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Anthony B. (In re Anthony M.-B.)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 28, 2022
    ...N.Y.S.2d 686, 484 N.E.2d 1038 ; Matter of Mariliz G. [Jamie G.], 207 A.D.3d 627, 170 N.Y.S.3d 505 ; Matter of Antonio T. [Franklin T.], 169 A.D.3d 699, 700, 93 N.Y.S.3d 369 ). The Family Court's findings with respect to credibility are entitled to great weight on appeal (see Matter of Brian......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT