In re Baez

Decision Date27 October 2016
Parties In the Matter of the Claim of Bertrand BAEZ, Respondent. PD 10276, Inc., Doing Business as Jan–Pro Cleaning Systems, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

143 A.D.3d 1190
41 N.Y.S.3d 146
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 07061

In the Matter of the Claim of Bertrand BAEZ, Respondent.

PD 10276, Inc., Doing Business as Jan–Pro Cleaning Systems, Appellant.


Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Oct. 27, 2016.


41 N.Y.S.3d 147

Jackson Lewis, PC, White Plains (Penny Ann Lieberman of counsel), for appellant.

Pamela B. Bleiwas, Ithaca, for Bertrand Baez, respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: GARRY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, ROSE and AARONS, JJ.

AARONS, J.

143 A.D.3d 1190

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 28, 2014, which, among other things, ruled that PD 10276, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on renumeration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

Claimant operated a janitorial cleaning service based upon a franchise agreement entered into with PD 10276, Inc., doing business as Jan–Pro Cleaning Systems (hereinafter Jan–Pro). In 2009, claimant ceased his operations and applied for unemployment insurance benefits. At the same time, the Department of Labor conducted an unemployment insurance tax audit of Jan–Pro for the period January 2006 through

143 A.D.3d 1191

December 2007. The Department issued initial determinations finding that claimant and others similarly situated were employees of Jan–Pro and that Jan–Pro owed additional unemployment insurance contributions in the amount of $30,166.93. Jan–Pro objected and, after a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge reversed the Department's determinations and sustained Jan–Pro's objections to the additional contributions due. On administrative appeal, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed the determinations of the Administrative Law Judge and found, among other things, that claimant was an employee of Jan–Pro. These appeals by Jan–Pro ensued.

Whether an employment relationship exists within the meaning of the unemployment insurance law is a factual question for the Board to determine and no one factor is determinative (see Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assoc. [Roberts], 60 N.Y.2d 734, 736, 469 N.Y.S.2d 78, 456 N.E.2d 1201 [1983] ; Matter of Cobrin [Telecom Consulting Group NE Corp.-Commissioner of Labor], 91 A.D.3d 992, 993, 936 N.Y.S.2d 361 [2012] ). “An employment relationship will be found when the evidence shows that the employer exercises control over the results produced or the means used to achieve the results, with control over the means [being] the more important factor” (Matter of McAlevey [Agewell Physical Therapy & Wellness, P.C.-Commissioner of Labor], 126 A.D.3d 1219, 1220, 5 N.Y.S.3d 609 [2015] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Kristensen [Law Offs. of David C. Birdoff–Commissioner of Labor], 138 A.D.3d 1318, 1319, 30 N.Y.S.3d 380 [2016] ). When the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence, it is beyond judicial review even if evidence supporting a contrary result exists in the record (see Matter of Isaacs [Speedy Media Assoc., LLC–Commissioner of Labor], 125 A.D.3d 1077, 1078, 3 N.Y.S.3d 776 [2015] ; Matter of Odyssey Transp., LLC [Commissioner of Labor], 62 A.D.3d 1175, 1176, 881 N.Y.S.2d 504 [2009] ).

41 N.Y.S.3d 148...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Link v. Cantor & Pecorella, Inc., 523326.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 10, 2017
    ... ... record that would support a contrary conclusion, we find that the Board's decision that Cantor exercised sufficient control over claimant and those similarly situated so as to establish an employment relationship is supported by substantial evidence and it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Baez [PD 10276, Inc.Commissioner of Labor], 143 A.D.3d 1190, 1192, 41 N.Y.S.3d 146 [2016] ; Matter of Atac [Fashion Realty GroupCommissioner of Labor], 265 A.D.2d 777, 777, 697 N.Y.S.2d 398 [1999] ; Matter of Feldstein [Feathered Nest, Inc.Commissioner of Labor], 253 A.D.2d at 993, 678 N.Y.S.2d 162 ; ... ...
  • In re Barrier Window Sys., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 20, 2017
    ... ... [Roberts], 60 N.Y.2d 734, 736, 469 N.Y.S.2d 78, 456 N.E.2d 1201 [1983] ; see 53 N.Y.S.3d 225 Matter of Mitchell [Nation Co. Ltd PartnersCommissioner of Labor], 145 A.D.3d 1404, 1405, 44 N.Y.S.3d 567 [2016] ; Matter of Baez [PD 10276, Inc.Commissioner of Labor], 143 A.D.3d 1190, 1191, 41 N.Y.S.3d 146 [2016] ). "[S]ubstantial evidence consists of proof within the whole record of such quality and quantity as to generate conviction in and persuade a fair and detached fact finder that, from that proof as a premise, a ... ...
  • In re Commissiong
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 1, 2017
    ... ... Enters. [Commissioner of Labor], 135 A.D.3d 1087, 1087, 23 N.Y.S.3d 419 [2016] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Empire State Towing & Recovery Assn., Inc. [Commissioner of Labor], 15 N.Y.3d 433, 437, 912 N.Y.S.2d 551, 938 N.E.2d 984 [2010] ; Matter of Baez [PD 10276, Inc.Commissioner of Labor], 143 A.D.3d 1190, 1191, 41 N.Y.S.3d 146 [2016] ). Whether an employment relationship exists is a factual issue for the Board to determine, and no single factor is determinative (see Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assoc. [Roberts], 60 N.Y.2d 734, 736, 469 ... ...
  • People v. Russell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 27, 2016
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT