In re Bianca G.

Decision Date30 November 2016
Parties In the Matter of BIANCA G. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; Tyra R.-W. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Karen M. Jansen, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Robert F. Meehan, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Eileen Campbell O'Brien of counsel), for petitioner-respondent (no brief filed).

Darren DeUrso, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child (no brief filed).

L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, and COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

Appeal from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Rachel Hahn, J.), dated October 5, 2015. The order, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the mother had abandoned the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the Westchester County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California (386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 ), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the motion of Karen M. Jansen for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant is granted, and she is directed to turn over all papers in her possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

ORDERED that Helene M. Greenberg, Esq., 45 Knollwood Road, Suite 502, Elmsford, N.Y., 10523, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By order on certification of this Court dated December 16, 2015, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

While we are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel, upon our independent review of the record, we conclude that there are nonfrivolous issues in this case, including, but not necessarily...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • In re Eshaghian
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Noviembre 2016
  • Zhuo Hong Zheng v. Cheng
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Noviembre 2016

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT