IN RE BLACKBURN, No. 83838-1.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Washington |
| Citation | 227 P.3d 1277,168 Wash.2d 1006 |
| Docket Number | No. 83838-1. |
| Parties | In re the Termination of Johnathon BLACKBURN, Christina Blackburn & Nathaniel Blackburn. |
| Decision Date | 10 February 2010 |
227 P.3d 1277
168 Wash.2d 1006
In re the Termination of Johnathon BLACKBURN, Christina Blackburn & Nathaniel Blackburn.
No. 83838-1.
Supreme Court of Washington.
February 10, 2010.
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered this matter at its February 9, 2010, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 3 That the Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review is granted and this matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals. It is further ordered that the Court of Appeals is directed to appoint separate counsel for each parent.
/s/ Barbara A. Madsen CHIEF JUSTICE
227 P.3d 1278
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 practice notes
-
Hardee v. State , No. 83728–7.
...48, 63, 215 P.3d 214 (2009). Hardee then successfully petitioned this court for review. Hardee v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010).Analysis ¶ 8 Hardee argues that constitutional due process requires the Department to justify its revocation of her home chi......
-
State v. Jasper, No. 63442-9-I.
...an argument similar to the one advanced by Jasper. See State v. Martin, 151 Wash.App. 98, 107-17, 210 P.3d 345 (2009), review granted, 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010). We held that the state constitution does not protect a criminal defendant's right to be present during trial more bro......
-
State v. David N.J.*, No. 18686.
...(extending Portuondo to cross-examination questions about defendant's opportunity to fabricate or tailor testimony), review granted, 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010); see State v. Martin, supra, at 116, 210 P.3d 345 (declining to reject Portuondo as matter of state constitutional law);......
-
State v. Martin, No. 83709–1.
...warrant an analysis independent from the Sixth Amendment.” State v. Martin, 151 Wash.App. 98, 109, 210 P.3d 345 (2009), review granted, 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010). It went on to affirm the trial court based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Portuondo v. Agard, 529 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Hardee v. State , No. 83728–7.
...48, 63, 215 P.3d 214 (2009). Hardee then successfully petitioned this court for review. Hardee v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010).Analysis ¶ 8 Hardee argues that constitutional due process requires the Department to justify its revocation of her home chi......
-
State v. Jasper, No. 63442-9-I.
...an argument similar to the one advanced by Jasper. See State v. Martin, 151 Wash.App. 98, 107-17, 210 P.3d 345 (2009), review granted, 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010). We held that the state constitution does not protect a criminal defendant's right to be present during trial more bro......
-
State v. David N.J.*, No. 18686.
...(extending Portuondo to cross-examination questions about defendant's opportunity to fabricate or tailor testimony), review granted, 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010); see State v. Martin, supra, at 116, 210 P.3d 345 (declining to reject Portuondo as matter of state constitutional law);......
-
State v. Martin, No. 83709–1.
...warrant an analysis independent from the Sixth Amendment.” State v. Martin, 151 Wash.App. 98, 109, 210 P.3d 345 (2009), review granted, 168 Wash.2d 1006, 226 P.3d 781 (2010). It went on to affirm the trial court based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Portuondo v. Agard, 529 ......
Request a trial to view additional results