In re Buchanan-Lyon, No. 26390.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
Writing for the CourtPer Curiam
Citation653 S.E.2d 277
PartiesIn the Matter of Pamela L. BUCHANAN-LYON, Respondent.
Decision Date05 November 2007
Docket NumberNo. 26390.
653 S.E.2d 277
In the Matter of Pamela L. BUCHANAN-LYON, Respondent.
No. 26390.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Submitted September 26, 2007.
Decided November 5, 2007.

[653 S.E.2d 278]

Lesley M. Coggiola, Disciplinary Counsel, and C. Tex Davis, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, both of Columbia, for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Pamela L. Buchanan-Lyon, pro se, of Anderson.

PER CURIAM:


In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to any sanction provided by Rule 7(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. She requests that any suspension or disbarment be made retroactive to April 6, 2006, the date she was transferred to incapacity inactive status. See In the Matter of Buchanan-Lyon, 368 S.C. 186, 628 S.E.2d 891 (2006). We accept the agreement and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in this state. Respondent's request to make the suspension retroactive is denied. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

FACTS

In March 2006, respondent filed a self-report in which she stated she had failed to comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 417, SCACR. Specifically, respondent did not maintain client trust ledgers or sufficient copies of receipts and disbursements to and from her trust account, she did not maintain or have her trust account bank statements in a readily accessible location, and she was not reconciling her trust account statements on a monthly basis. Due in part to respondent's failure to comply with Rule 417, SCACR, as of March 2006, at least $18,000 in client funds were unaccounted for and respondent did not have sufficient funds in her trust account to cover the client funds.

Respondent requests the Court consider her diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder in mitigation of her misconduct. According to the agreement, respondent has been fully cooperative and forthright with ODC throughout the investigation.

LAW

Respondent admits that by her misconduct she has violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR: Rule 1.15 (lawyer shall safekeep client property); and Rule 8.4(a) (lawyer shall not violate Rules of Professional Conduct). Further, respondent admits her misconduct violated Rule 417, SCACR. In addition, respondent admits her misconduct...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Widdicombe v. Tucker-Cales, No. 26388.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • November 5, 2007
    ...court's exercise of jurisdiction in this case pursuant to the doctrine of unclean hands, but affirm the opinion on all other grounds. 653 S.E.2d 277 FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL The family court issued an emergency ex parte order granting respondent (Father) custody of the parties' minor child. Subse......
1 cases
  • Widdicombe v. Tucker-Cales, No. 26388.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • November 5, 2007
    ...court's exercise of jurisdiction in this case pursuant to the doctrine of unclean hands, but affirm the opinion on all other grounds. 653 S.E.2d 277 FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL The family court issued an emergency ex parte order granting respondent (Father) custody of the parties' minor child. Subse......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT