In re Bunch

• Decision Date: 09 August 2022
• Docket Number: S22Y0917
• Citation: 314 Ga. 423,877 S.E.2d 274
• Parties: In the MATTER OF Amber Holly BUNCH.
• Court: Georgia Supreme Court

314 Ga. 423

877 S.E.2d 274

In the MATTER OF Amber Holly BUNCH.

S22Y0917

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: August 9, 2022

Andreea N. Morrison, Assistant General Counsel, Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel, William Dallas NeSmith, III, Deputy General Counsel, Jenny K. Mittelman, State Bar of Georgia, 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 100, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2934, for Appellant.

Ivan Andrew Gustafson, Law Office of Ivan Gustafson, 69 Lawrenceville Street, McDonough, Georgia 30253, for Appellee.

Delia T. Crouch, Law Office of Delia T. Crouch, 8 Lee Street, Newnan, Georgia 30263, for Other Party.

Per Curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of Special Master Delia T. Crouch, who recommends that the Court accept the petition for voluntary surrender of license filed by Amber Holly Bunch (State Bar No. 994313), after the filing of a formal complaint. See Bar Rule 4-227 (c). In her petition, Bunch requested that she be allowed to voluntarily surrender her license for her admitted violations, in two separate but related matters, of Rules 1.3, 1.15 (I) (a), 1.15 (I) (c), 1.15 (II) (a), 1.15 (II) (b), and 3.2 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). While one of the matters has not yet been docketed with this Court, is considered confidential, and was not before the Special Master, Bunch waived confidentiality and requested that the Special Master also consider the admissions of fact and rule violations in that matter as part of her petition.

In her petition, Bunch, who has been a member of the State Bar since 2016, admitted the following facts. With regard to State Disciplinary Board Docket ("SDBD") No. 7462, Bunch admitted that in December 2017, a client retained her for a personal injury action arising from an accident. Bunch eventually settled the client's claim against the defendant for the policy limit of $100,000 in April 2018 and deposited the settlement check into her IOLTA account. However, Bunch failed to safeguard the settlement funds and allowed the balance in her trust account to fall below the amount she should have held for the client, and she also failed to maintain records reflecting the balance held for her client in the IOLTA account. In addition, Bunch maintained personal funds in her IOLTA account during the same time she held funds for the client; she withdrew funds for her personal use; and she did not deliver the settlement funds to her client until January 2021. She further admitted that she used personal funds to disburse the settlement funds to her client and that she did not disburse the settlement funds from her IOLTA account. During the litigation of her client's lawsuit, Bunch also failed to adequately respond to discovery sent by the uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier on behalf of the client, and the uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier filed several motions to compel discovery, but Bunch failed to file a response to those motions either. With regard to SDBD No. 7508, the undocketed matter, Bunch admitted that from September 2018 to March 2020, she maintained personal funds in her IOLTA account; she failed to keep records showing the exact balance held for each client; and she failed to safeguard client funds.

Based on her conduct in SDBD No. 7462, Bunch admitted violating Rule 1.3 by failing to respond to motions on behalf of her client. In addition, she admitted violating Rules 1.15 (I) (a) and 1.15 (I) (c) by failing to safeguard the client's settlement funds, commingling personal and client funds, failing to keep complete records of the client's funds, failing to properly account for the client's funds, and failing to promptly deliver the settlement funds to the client. Next, Bunch admitted that she violated Rules 1.15 (II) (a) and 1.15 (II) (b) by failing to administer client funds from a trust account, by failing to maintain records reflecting the balance held for her client, and at times having a lower balance in her trust account than the amount she should have been holding for her client. Bunch also admitted that she could not ascertain from her existing records when the client's money had been withdrawn and for what purpose. Next, Bunch admitted that she violated Rule 3.2 by failing to respond to discovery and motions filed against the client in order to expedite the litigation consistent with the client's interests. Finally, as to SDBD No. 7508, Bunch admitted that based...