IN RE COLUMBIA MED. CENTER OF LAS COLINAS
Decision Date | 12 March 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 09-0733.,09-0733. |
Citation | 306 SW 3d 246 |
Parties | In re COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF LAS COLINAS d/b/a Las Colinas Medical Center, Relator. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
R. Brent Cooper, Diana L. Faust, Michelle E. Robberson, Richard Clark Harrist, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Dallas, for Relator.
Melvin H. Wolovits, Melvin H. Wolovits, P.C., Darren Patrick Nicholson, Mark S. Werbner, Sayles/Werbner, P.C., Dallas, for Real Party in Interested.
In this mandamus case, we must decide whether a trial court abused its discretion by refusing to reduce a punitive damages award where such damages were statutorily capped as measured against an economic damages award. We hold that it did. In a previous appeal of this same underlying case, we rendered a judgment that reduced the amount of economic damages awarded. Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas, Inc. v. Hogue, 271 S.W.3d 238, 257 (Tex.2008). Although our judgment did not also expressly order a reduction of the award of punitive damages, it is what the statute requires. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.CODE § 41.008(b). Accordingly, we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.
In the underlying suit, the widow and sons of Robert Hogue, Jr. won a jury verdict on their medical malpractice claims against Columbia Medical Center. The trial court and court of appeals awarded them economic and punitive damages. Id. ( ). On appeal, we reversed the judgment of the court of appeals in part, vacating a portion of the economic damages award—loss of inheritance damages—for want of legally sufficient evidence, while affirming the rest of the judgment. Columbia Med. Ctr., 271 S.W.3d at 257. Our judgment read in relevant part:
After our mandate issued, Columbia attempted to tender payment to the Hogues, subtracting the loss of inheritance damages amount, and reducing the punitive damages amount proportionately. When the Hogues refused this payment, Columbia moved the trial court to enter a modified final judgment that would effectuate our mandate by reducing the economic damages award appropriately, as well as by reducing the punitive damages award to twice the amount of the economic damages award we affirmed, plus interest. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing, leaving intact the court of appeals' punitive damages award, which had been measured against an economic damages award that included loss of inheritance damages. As a result, the amount of punitive damages awarded by the final judgment exceeds the statutory cap.
Columbia petitioned this Court for mandamus relief. We have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus to enforce our orders. See Lee v. Downey, 842 S.W.2d 646, 648 (Tex.1992) ( ); Gammel Statesman Publ'g Co. v. Ben C. Jones & Co., 206 S.W. 931, 932-33 ( )("This Court's jurisdiction continues until the case is fully determined by the court and its judgment is completely executed by the court below.").
A writ of mandamus will issue when a trial court clearly abuses its discretion and there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2004). A trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to analyze or apply the law correctly. In re Poly-America, L.P., 262 S.W.3d 337, 346-47 (Tex.2008).
Punitive damages awards that are statutorily capped are required to be recalculated when the actual damages against which they are measured are reduced on appeal. See,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thi of Tex. At Lubbock I Llc v. Perea
...damage caps contained in § 41.008(b) "requires a reduction of punitive damages as a matter of law." In re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, 306 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex.2010). But see Wackenhut Corr. Corp. v. de la Rosa, 305 S.W.3d 594 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2009, no pet.) (holding that......
-
Elec. Reliability Council of Tex., Inc. v. Panda Power Generation Infrastructure Fund, LLC
...A trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to analyze or apply the law correctly. See, e.g. , In re Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas , 306 S.W.3d 246, 248 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding). "This principle applies even when the law is unsettled." In re J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. , 492 S......