In re Disciplinary Action Against McGuire, 20040073.
Decision Date | 31 August 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 20040073.,20040073. |
Citation | 2004 ND 171,685 N.W.2d 748 |
Parties | In the Matter of the Application for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael O. McGUIRE, Judge of the District Court. Judicial Conduct Commission, Petitioner v. Michael O. McGuire, Respondent. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Paul W. Jacobson (argued), Disciplinary Staff, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner.
Mark J. Condon (on brief), Johnson & Condon, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.
Michael O. McGuire (on brief), pro se, Fargo, ND, for respondent.
SUSPENSION ORDERED.
[¶ 1] This is a disciplinary proceeding against Michael O. McGuire, Judge of the District Court for the East Central Judicial District. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence that Judge McGuire violated N.D.Code Jud. Conduct Canons 1A, 2, and 3B(4). We suspend Judge McGuire from his position as a district judge, without net pay from November 1, 2004, through the end of his term of office on December 31, 2004, and assess against him the costs and attorney fees necessary for the prosecution of these proceedings.
[¶ 2] Judge McGuire graduated from the University of North Dakota School of Law in 1970 and was first elected Cass County Judge with Increased Jurisdiction in 1978. He was appointed district judge in 1979 and was elected district judge in 1980, 1986, 1992 and 1998. He currently serves in Judgeship Number 4 of the East Central Judicial District in Fargo and was Presiding Judge of the District from February 2001 until May 23, 2003. He is not seeking re-election and will end his term of office on December 31, 2004.
[¶ 3] In November 2003, the Judicial Conduct Commission initiated formal proceedings against Judge McGuire concerning allegations of inappropriate behavior directed at seven female employees in the Cass County Courthouse. In a 14-count complaint, Judge McGuire was charged with violating N.D.Code Jud. Conduct Canons 1A, 2, 3B(4), and 4A(2). A hearing was held before a four-person hearing panel on March 2, 2004. The panel found the following facts:
4.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Neely v. Wyo. Comm'n on Judicial Conduct & Ethics (In re Neely)
...rejected vagueness challenges in judicial discipline matters. Matter of Halverson , 169 P.3d at 1176 ; Judicial Conduct Comm'n v. McGuire (In re McGuire) , 685 N.W.2d 748, 761 (N.D. 2004) ; In re Barr , 13 S.W.3d 525, 565 (Tex. Rev. Trib. 1998) ; In re Complaint Against Harper , 77 Ohio St.......
-
Inquiry Concerning Complaint of Judicial Standards Comm'n of State v. Baugh, PR 14–0078.
...by the Commission, as the body that had the opportunity directly to observe the witnesses and their demeanor.”); In re Disciplinary Action Against McGuire, 2004 ND 171, ¶ 6, 685 N.W.2d 748 (“Although our review is de novo, we accord due weight to the hearing body's findings because the hear......
-
Inquiry Concerning Complaint of Judicial Standards Comm'n of State v. Judge G. Todd Baugh, PR 14–0078.
...by the Commission, as the body that had the opportunity directly to observe the witnesses and their demeanor.”); In re Disciplinary Action Against McGuire, 2004 ND 171, ¶ 6, 685 N.W.2d 748 (“Although our review is de novo, we accord due weight to the hearing body's findings because the hear......
-
Simons v. State
...distinct for fair administration of the law.’ ” State v. Holbach, 2009 ND 37, ¶ 24, 763 N.W.2d 761 (quoting In re Disciplinary Action Against McGuire, 2004 ND 171, ¶ 19, 685 N.W.2d 748). A statute is not unconstitutionally vague merely because it does not specifically state all of the vario......