In re Eaton

Decision Date10 April 1873
Citation27 Mich. 1
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesIn re Mary Eaton

Heard April 9, 1873

Application for habeas corpus.

Prayer of the petition denied.

F. A. Baker, for petitioner.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The prisoner is in confinement in the house of correction, under sentence for larceny from the person. Petition was presented for a writ of habeas corpus, to test the sufficiency of the information on which she was convicted. The court held that this would be to make the writ of habeas corpus take the place of a writ of error, which was not an allowable use of the process, and consequently they denied the prayer of the petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Dye v. Skeen
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1950
    ...In Re Blair, 4 Wis. 552; People v. Cassells, 5 Hill [N.Y.] 164; State v. [Towle, 42] N.H. 540; Williamson's Case, 26 Pa.St. 9; Matter of Eaton, 27 Mich. 1. * * 'Errors which render the judgment merely voidable and do not make it absolutely void, can not be enquired into under a writ of habe......
  • People v. Carpentier, Docket No. 97268
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1994
    ...objective factor external to the defense [that] impeded ... efforts to comply with the State's procedural rules").2 See also In re Eaton, 27 Mich. 1 (1873).Statements to the contrary in People v. Johnson, 396 Mich. 424, 444, 240 N.W.2d 729 (1976), are simply unfounded obiter dicta. People v......
  • Ex parte Talley
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
    • December 1, 1910
    ...that an objection to the verification of an information, not made until after the jury is sworn, comes too late. In the case of In re Mary Eaton, 27 Mich. 1, it was held that a writ of habeas corpus will not be granted, after a final judgment in an ordinary criminal case, to test the suffic......
  • Ex parte Krusiewicz, Motion No. 118.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • May 16, 1933
    ...available to one who has been convicted of crime by a court that has properly acquired jurisdiction and has not exceeded its powers. In re Eaton, 27 Mich. 1;In re Joseph, 206 Mich. 659, 173 N. W. 358; People v. Jury, supra; In re Palm, 255 Mich. 632, 238 N. W. 732; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT