In re Estate
Decision Date | 14 February 2018 |
Docket Number | No. M2017–00602–COA–R3–CV,M2017–00602–COA–R3–CV |
Citation | 562 S.W.3d 409 |
Parties | IN RE ESTATE OF James Kemmler ROGERS |
Court | Tennessee Court of Appeals |
John A. Beam, III, and Irene R. Haude, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Patricia Porter Kryder.
Andra J. Hedrick, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellees, James Schneider Rogers and Jennifer Rogers–Etcheverry.
Thomas R. Frierson, II, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which J. Steven Stafford, P.J., W.S., and Arnold B. Goldin, J., joined.
This probate action is before this Court on appeal for the second time. Following remand from this Court subsequent to the first appeal, the trial court determined that the petitioner did have standing to file her petition for probate as a "purported creditor" of the decedent. The trial court ultimately denied the petition, however, finding "no basis for either primary or ancillary probate in Tennessee." The trial court had also previously awarded sanctions against the petitioner and her counsel pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The petitioner has appealed. Discerning no error in the trial court's denials of both primary and ancillary probate, we affirm such determinations. Although we also affirm the trial court's imposition of Rule 11 sanctions against the petitioner and her counsel generally, we vacate the specific award granted against the petitioner personally and remand such issue to the trial court for a determination of the proper amount of sanctions to be awarded against the petitioner solely pursuant to Rule 11.02(1). We affirm the trial court's judgment in all other respects.
The factual and procedural history of this case previous to the first appeal is explained as follows by this Court's opinion in In re Estate of Rogers , No. M2015-01439-COA-R3-CV, 2016 WL 6087662, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2016) (" Rogers I "):
Id. at *1–2. Following a determination that no valid final judgment had been entered by the trial court because the standing issue had never been adjudicated, this Court dismissed the appeal and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings. Id. at *6.
Following remand and additional briefing by the parties, the trial court determined by order dated December 9, 2016, that Ms. Kryder maintained standing to file her petition for probate as a "purported creditor" of Mr. Rogers ("Decedent"). As the trial court explained:
Ms. Kryder does meet the minimum requirements of constitutional standing in order to present a justiciable controversy under ACLU of Tenn. v. Darnell , 195 S.W.3d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cnty. of Sumner v. Delinquent Taxpayers
... ... property but that he was required to pay the rent requested ... by Ms. Atchley in addition to an additional sum of interest, ... slightly more than he had initially calculated. The trial ... court found that Mr. Kalbes was a licensed real estate agent ... and broker and that he did have notice of Ms. Atchley's ... demand for rent. Mr. Kalbes timely filed a notice of appeal ... Although he was represented by counsel in the trial court, ... Mr. Kalbes has proceeded pro se on appeal ... II ... ...