In re Firestone/Ford Litigation, 04-0262.

Decision Date04 May 2004
Docket NumberNo. 04-0262.,04-0262.
Citation166 S.W.3d 2
PartiesIn re FIRESTONE/FORD LITIGATION.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

On March 19, 2004, Bridgestone/Firestone and Ford filed a motion for MDL transfer concerning the following tread-separation cases: Cause No. 2003-5187, Dorothy Aragon, Et Al. v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, Et Al., 327th Judicial District Court of El Paso County, Texas; Cause No. 03-C-780, Ronald D. Ratliff, Et Al. v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, Et Al.,5th Judicial District Court of Cass County, Texas; and Cause No. CV03-51791-43, Julie Pressley, Et Al. v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, Et Al., 43rd Judicial District Court of Parker County, Texas. The motion was served on all plaintiffs' counsel on March 18. A response was due 20 days from service of the motion. See Rule 13.3(d). No response has been filed.

Having reviewed the unopposed motion and the exhibits, the panel has concluded that the cases involve common questions of fact and that transferring them to a pretrial judge would be for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and would promote the just and efficient conduct of the cases.

The motion to transfer is granted, and the cases are transferred to Hon. Michael Mayes, Judge of the 410th District Court of Montgomery County.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • In re Ad Valorem Tax Litigation
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 26, 2007
    ...tires and products containing asbestos and silica, which have been involved in some of our previous MDL proceedings. See In re Firestone/Ford Litig., 166 S.W.3d 2 (Tex. Jud. MDL Panel 2004)(tires); In re Silica Products Liability Litig., 166 S.W.3d 3 (Tex. Jud. MDL Panel 2004)(silica); Unio......
  • In re Wellington Ins. Co. Hailstorm Litig.
    • United States
    • Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
    • February 13, 2014
    ...Switch Litig., 285 S.W.3d 185 (Tex.M.D.L. Panel 2008) ; In re Vioxx Litig., No. 05–0436 (Tex.M.D.L. Panel Aug. 25, 2005); In re Firestone/Ford Litig., 166 S.W.3d 2 (Tex.M.D.L. Panel 2004) ; In re Silica Prods. Liab. Litig., 166 S.W.3d 3 (Tex.M.D.L. Panel 2004). In all these cases relatednes......
  • In re Digitek® Litig.
    • United States
    • Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
    • August 5, 2009
    ...Switch Litig., 285 S.W.3d 185 (Tex. M.D.L. Panel 2008); In re Vioxx, No. 05–0436 (Tex.M.D.L.Panel, Aug. 25, 2005); In re Firestone/Ford Litig., 166 S.W.3d 2 (Tex. M.D.L. Panel 2004). Like the Ford,Vioxx, and Firestone/ Ford cases, these Digitek cases are related because they involve the sam......
  • In re Ad Valorem Tax Litigation
    • United States
    • Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
    • April 19, 2006
    ...tires and products containing asbestos and silica, which have been involved in some of our previous MDL proceedings. See In re Firestone/Ford Litigation, 166 S.W.3d 2 (Tex. Jud. MDL Panel 2004) (tires); In re Silica Products Liability Litigation, 166 S.W.3d 3 (Tex. Jud. MDL Panel 2004) (sil......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT