In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation

Decision Date27 July 2009
Docket NumberMaster File No. 1:06-MD-1789 (JFK).
PartiesIn re FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Actions.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Timothy M. O'Brien, Esq., Meghan Tans, Esq., Ned McWilliams, Esq., Levan Papnatonio Thomas Mitchell Echsner & Proctor, P.A., Michelle Parfitt, Esq., James Green, Esq., Ashcraft & Gerel, for the Plaintiff's Steering Committee.

Norman C. Kleinberg, Esq., William J. Beausoleil, Esq., Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Paul F. Strain, Esq., David J. Heubeck, Esq., Stephen Marshall, Esq., Venable LLP, Christy D. Jones, Esq., Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada PLLC, for Defendant Merck & Co., Inc.

OPINION & ORDER

JOHN F. KEENAN, District Judge.

Currently pending in this multi-district litigation ("MDL") are omnibus Daubert motions filed by the Plaintiffs Steering Committee ("PSC") and Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. ("Merck"). For the following reasons, the Court rules as follows.

I. Background1

Merck makes and distributes Fosamax (alendronate), an FDA-approved drug widely prescribed for the treatment or prevention of osteoporosis. Fosamax belongs to a class of drugs called bisphosphonates. Bisphosphonate drugs have become standard treatment for various metabolic and oncologic diseases related to abnormalities in the bone remodeling cycle.

Also referred to as bone turnover, the bone remodeling cycle is a continuous process of renewal in which old or damaged bone is broken down (resorbed) and then replaced with new bone. The process starts by activation of the osteoclast, which is the cell responsible for resorption. The osteoclast breaks down a small amount of bone, leaving an excavated pit that becomes the bone remodeling unit. A bone-building cell called an osteoblast then fills the bone remodeling unit with organic bone matrix that, once mineralized, becomes new bone. The living bone cell itself is called the osteocyte. The rate of bone remodeling varies depending on the skeletal site.

Osteoporosis is a disease that afflicts more than 10 million Americans over the age of 50, 80% of whom are women. In healthy young adults, bone resorption and formation are balanced. With aging, bone turnover can become unbalanced due to relative decreases in osteoblast activity or increases in osteoclast activity. In addition, as women age, the decline in estrogen levels after menopause can stimulate osteoclast activity and resorption. The uneven remodeling cycle produces net bone loss. Over time, this leads to reduced bone density and quality and an increased risk of fracture.2 An additional 34 million Americans have low bone mass and are considered at risk for osteoporosis, a state referred to as osteopenia. The high incidence of fracture in persons with osteoporosis is a major public health concern.

Several other diseases are related to abnormalities in bone turnover. Paget's disease of bone is characterized by accelerated turnover that results in the production of new bone that is structurally defective. In metastatic bone disease, tumors metastasize into the skeleton and stimulate osteoclast activity, causing hypercalcemia and bone pain. One form of osteopetrosis, which is a group of disorders characterized by very dense bone, involves defective osteoclast function.

Bisphosphonates are synthetic analogues of inorganic pyrophosphate. At the tissue level, the primary effect of all bisphosphonates is to inhibit bone resorption. Because bone resorption and formation are linked, bisphosphonates also have a secondary effect of decreasing formation and remodeling. In addition, bisphosphonates are known to inhibit angiogenesis, which is the sprouting of new blood vessels from existing ones.

The first generation bisphosphonates, developed in the 1960s and 1970s, were relatively weak. The new generations have a nitrogen-containing amino side chain that greatly enhances their anti-resorptive potency.

At the cellular level, bisphosphonate binds to the surface of bone mineral, accumulating preferentially in areas with a high rate of bone turnover. At active sites of resorption, the bisphosphonate is released from bone and taken up into the osteoclast. There, it inhibits enzymes necessary for the osteoclast's function and survival. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that is not released during resorption remains in the bone and has a half-life of ten or more years.

The FDA approved Fosamax in 1995 for the treatment of osteoporosis and Paget's disease and in 1997 for the prevention of osteoporosis. Fosamax was the first of three nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates approved for oral administration to treat these conditions.3 Since their market introduction, oral bisphosphonates have been prescribed by doctors over 225 million times. The efficacy of these drugs in arresting bone loss and reducing the risk of fracture in osteoporotic persons is well-established.

Also on the market are two nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates which are intravenously administered for the treatment of metastatic bone disease and multiple myeloma.4 These intravenous ("IV") bisphosphonates are prescribed in higher doses and are more potent than the ones taken orally for osteoporosis. In addition, oral bisphosphonates are poorly absorbed into the bloodstream. Therefore, they have lower bioavailability for incorporation into bone than IV bisphosphonates.

Since October 2003, there have been published reports of bisphosphonate users developing a rare condition called osteonecrosis of the jaws ("ONJ"). ONJ is characterized clinically by an area of dead jaw bone that becomes exposed to the oral cavity. Symptoms can include pain, swelling, and purulent secretion.

The vast majority of ONJ cases since 2003 have been reported in patients taking IV bisphosphonates. However, there have been reports of ONJ in patients taking oral bisphosphonates. The condition usually develops after an invasive dental procedure, such as a tooth extraction, but has presented spontaneously in some cases.

In August 2004, the FDA issued a Post-Marketing Safety Review concluding that ONJ may be a class effect of all bisphosphonates, rather than limited to IV bisphosphonates. In July 2005, at the FDA's request, Merck updated the Fosamax label to make reference to ONJ.

ONJ can occur in the absence of bisphosphonate use, but its background rate in the population is not known. It has been reported to occur with radiation therapy to the head and neck, osteomyelitis (inflammation/infection of bone marrow), osteopetrosis, herpes zoster virus infection, chemotherapy, and major trauma.5 The risk of developing ONJ is increased by factors such as periodontal disease, poor oral hygiene, and trauma.

As reports of ONJ in bisphosphonate users increased, many medical, dental, and oral maxillofacial organizations commissioned expert panels to study the problem. They have issued guidelines and recommendations for diagnosing, preventing, and treating what is now commonly referred to as "bisphosphonate-associated ONJ (`BON')" or "bisphosphonate-related ONJ (`BRONJ')." For example, under a working definition promulgated by the American Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons ("AAOMS"), a person can be diagnosed with BRONJ if the following three conditions are met: (1) current or previous treatment with a bisphosphonate, (2) exposed, necrotic bone in the maxillofacial region that has persisted for more than eight weeks, and (3) no history of radiation therapy to the jaws. The AAOMS also devised a staging system that categorizes patients with BRONJ into stage 0, stage 1, stage 2, or stage 3, depending on their clinical signs and symptoms. In severe cases, regions of necrotic bone must be surgically removed.

By all estimates, the risk of developing ONJ while taking an oral bisphosphonate for osteoporosis is very small. According to Merck, the worldwide reporting rate among Fosamax users is less than what Merck refers to as 1 in 100,000 patient-treatment years. This number is consistent with a study conducted in Germany that found the prevalence to be 3.8 in 100,000 patients (.00038%). Other studies have found the prevalence to be substantially higher. A survey conducted in Australia, published in 2007, calculated the rate to be between 0.01% to 0.04% for all oral bisphosphonate users and 0.09% to 0.34% for those who had dental extractions. A recent FDA-approved database study by Kaiser Permanente found it to be 0.09% for oral bisphosphonate users.

Since 2006, approximately 800 federal actions have been filed by plaintiffs who allege that Fosamax caused them to develop ONJ. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, these cases were consolidated in this Court for pretrial coordination.6 The parties recently completed generic fact and expert discovery, as well as case-specific discovery in a sample of cases. The first of three "bellwether" or test trials is scheduled to commence on August 11, 2009.

The strict products liability and negligence claims asserted by plaintiffs in this MDL are predicated primarily on a failure to warn theory. The substantive state law that governs these claims varies. In general, the plaintiffs will have to prove, among other things, that Fosamax is capable of causing ONJ (general causation) and that Merck should have known of this risk and provided a warning.

On behalf of all plaintiffs, the PSC has designated seven witnesses who have proffered expert testimony relevant to these common issues. Merck has designated a number of witnesses who would offer opposing expert testimony. On May 8, 2009, each side filed a motion challenging the other's experts pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702.7 The Court has considered the voluminous submissions presented on the motions, including the export reports, curriculum vitae, and deposition testimonies of the challenged witnesses. Earlier this month, five witnesses were...

To continue reading

Request your trial
207 cases
  • JFJ Toys, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Corp., Civil Action No. PX–14–3527
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • February 21, 2017
    ...a legal conclusion. See Eghnayem v. Boston Sci. Corp. , 57 F.Supp.3d 658, 699 (S.D.W. Va. 2014) (quoting In re Fosamax Prods. Liab. Litig. , 645 F.Supp.2d 164, 192 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) ) (excluding expert opinion where the report is a narrative review of documents and rife with legal conclusions......
  • Capri Sun GmbH v. American Beverage Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 31, 2022
    ...be apparent without the benefit of experience or specialized knowledge." Scott , 315 F.R.D. at 45 (quoting In re Fosamax Prods. Liab. Litig. , 645 F. Supp. 2d 164, 192 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) ). For example, it would be by no means obvious to a lay juror how and in what manner household penetration......
  • Valente v. Textron, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 18, 2013
    ...of the Federal Rules of Evidence, only serious flaws in reasoning or methodology will warrant exclusion.” In re Fosamax Products Liab. Litig., 645 F.Supp.2d 164, 173 (S.D.N.Y.2009) (citing Amorgianos v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 303 F.3d 256, 267 (2d Cir.2002)).a. Defendants' Motion to Pr......
  • In re Young Broadcasting Inc.
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Second Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 19, 2010
    ...of `knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education' qualify an expert as such." (quoting FED.R.EVID. 702)); In re Fosamax, 645 F.Supp.2d 164, 173 (S.D.N.Y.2009); TC Systems, Inc. v. Town of Colonie, N.Y., 213 F.Supp.2d 171, 174 These bases for qualification are disjunctive such that p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Excluding Or Limiting FDA Regulatory Expert Opinion
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • February 1, 2016
    ...and may either exclude it in whole, or at least limit it. For example, the court in In re Fosomax Products Liability Litigation, 645 F. Supp. 2d 164, 191-92 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) precluded an expert from offering a narrative history of Fosamax, permitting the expert to only comment on company doc......
4 books & journal articles
  • Presenting Your Expert at Trial and Arbitration
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Qualifying & Attacking Expert Witnesses
    • May 4, 2022
    ...Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 303 F.3d 256, 267 (2d Cir. 2002) (internal citations omitted); See also, In re Fosamax Prod. Liab. Litig., 645 F. Supp. 2d 164, 179 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) citing Heller v. Shaw Indus., Inc., 167 F.3d 146, 155–56 (3d Cir. 1999): In the actual practice of medicine, physic......
  • Presenting Your Expert at Trial and Arbitration
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Qualifying & Attacking Expert Witnesses - 2021 Contents
    • August 4, 2021
    ...Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 303 F.3d 256, 267 (2d Cir. 2002) (internal citations omitted); See also, In re Fosamax Prod. Liab. Litig., 645 F. Supp. 2d 164, 179 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) citing Heller v. Shaw Indus., Inc., 167 F.3d 146, 155–56 (3d Cir. 1999): In the actual practice of medicine, physic......
  • Presenting Your Expert at Trial and Arbitration
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Qualifying & Attacking Expert Witnesses - 2019 Contents
    • August 4, 2019
    ...Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 303 F.3d 256, 267 (2d Cir. 2002) (internal citations omitted); See also, In re Fosamax Prod. Liab. Litig., 645 F. Supp. 2d 164, 179 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) citing Heller v. Shaw Indus., Inc., 167 F.3d 146, 155–56 (3d Cir. 1999): In the actual practice of medicine, physic......
  • Presenting Your Expert at Trial and Arbitration
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Qualifying & Attacking Expert Witnesses - 2020 Contents
    • August 4, 2020
    ...Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 303 F.3d 256, 267 (2d Cir. 2002) (internal citations omitted); See also, In re Fosamax Prod. Liab. Litig., 645 F. Supp. 2d 164, 179 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) citing Heller v. Shaw Indus., Inc., 167 F.3d 146, 155–56 (3d Cir. 1999): In the actual practice of medicine, physic......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT