In re Galt
Decision Date | 06 January 1903 |
Docket Number | 906. |
Parties | In re GALT. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Aaron A. Wolfersperger, for appellant.
Martin J. Gillen, for appellee.
On February 25, 1902, Frank Galt filed in the district court a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, and was adjudged a bankrupt February 28th, and thereafter I. L. Weaver was duly appointed his trustee. On March 12, 1902, the Mitchell & Lewis Company Limited, a corporation of the state of Wisconsin, located at Racine, in that state, filed its petition in the bankruptcy proceedings, representing that on April 26, 1901, the petitioner appointed Frank Galt, the bankrupt, its agent at Sterling, Ill., for the sale of its manufacture under which certain goods were consigned to Galt for sale, of which, at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, Galt had on hand goods of the value of $987.85, which were taken possession of by the trustee in the bankruptcy proceeding and which he refused to deliver to the petitioner. The contract under which the goods were consigned, as claimed, is as follows:
notes, as follows: All notes taken for said wagons are to be on the blanks furnished by Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited; are to bear seven per cent. interest per annum from date until paid, and not running over six months from date of sale, made payable at the nearest bank or express office, with the post-office address of the purchaser distinctly written thereon.
As an inducement to make sales for cash only, said Mitchell and Lewis Co., Limited, agree to allow said party of the second part the sum of five per cent. on all cash sales; the cash to be remitted to said Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited, as hereinafter stated. It is agreed that, after the first shipment under this contract, the prices on all future shipments of wagons shall be subject to such change as may be occasioned by the advance or decline in material or labor. The said Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited, warrant all their wagons as per printed form of warranty in catalogue. The said party of the second part agrees to receive, store, pay freight, and keep under cover, in good condition and fully insured, at his own expense, all wagons sent him, until sold or ordered away by the party of the first part as herein provided; to pay all the taxes on wagons on hand, should any assessment be made; to make all reasonable efforts to sell said wagons; and not to sell or assist in the sale of any other wagon or wagons, except those furnished by the party of the first part under this contract; to settle for all wagons sold by him as such agent, make all sales and take all evidence of indebtedness therefor, for and in the name of said party of the first part, upon such blanks as the party of the first part shall furnish, and remit the cash and notes received for said wagons to the party of the first part in the following manner: The cash to be remitted as early as the day following the date of sale, by draft on Chicago or New York, payable to the order of Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited and the notes to be transmitted every thirty days, or as much oftener as said second party may desire; each remittance of notes to be accompanied by a statement showing the number and kind of wagons on hand and unsold. All notes so transmitted are to be indorsed and payment guarantied by the said party of the second part in the following form, viz.: 'For value received, the undersigned guaranty the payment of the within note, and hereby waive notice of protest, demand, and nonpayment thereof.' The party of the second part agrees that all notes or obligations indorsed or guarantied by him, if not paid in two months after maturity, he will take up the same, and pay the cash to said party of the first part. In case all the sales should be for notes, and the notes so returned to Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited, should be for a greater amount than the price of wagons to be accounted for as herein stated, the surplus of commission contained in said note or notes will be paid to the party of the second part, when and in proportion to the amount collected. The party of the second part further agrees to sell all wagons shipped him under the within agreement within twelve months from date of shipment, and, in case of any failure or neglect to do so, agrees to settle at the expiration of that time, or at any time thereafter when called upon to do so, for all wagons and parts of wagons remaining on hand unsold, at prices hereinbefore stated in the following manner, to wit: At the option of the Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited, to either pay the cash for said wagons, or give his note, due in four months, with seven per cent. interest after maturity, payable to Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited, or order, or to store said wagons in good order, free of charge, subject to the order of said Mitchell & Lewis Co., Limited. If the said party of the second part at any time during the continuance of the within contract sell or close out his business, he agrees to purchase all wagons remaining on hand unsold, paying cash therefor, or transfer same to his successors on such terms as will be satisfactory to the party of the first part, without cost to said party of the first part. If the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Charles M. Stieff, Inc., v. City of San Antonio
...transaction from a bailment to a sale. In re Eichengreen, D. C., 18 F.2d 101; Reliance Shoe Co. v. Manly, 4 Cir., 25 F.2d 381; In re Galt, 7 Cir., 120 F. 64. In this matter, some of the indicia of a sale may be present in a bailment. Some such incidental features have, apparently, led to th......
-
City of San Antonio v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.
...from a bailment to a sale. In re Eichengreen (D. C.) 18 F.(2d) 101; Reliance Shoe Co. v. Manly (C. C. A.) 25 F.(2d) 381; In re Galt (C. C. A.) 120 F. 64. In this matter, some of the indicia of a sale may be present in a bailment. Some such incidental features have, apparently, led to the vi......
-
United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc.
...the transaction from a bailment to a sale. In re Eichengreen, D.C., 18 F.2d 101; Reliance Shoe Co. v. Manly, 4 Cir., 25 F.2d 381; In re Galt, 7 Cir., 120 F. 64. * * *" The plaintiff also calls attention to the printed words, "Return of merchandise will not be accepted without seller's autho......
-
In re Miss. Valley Livestock, Inc.
...sender [has] the right to compel a return of the thing sent, or has the receiver the option to pay for the thing in money?” In re Galt, 120 F. 64, 68 (7th Cir.1903) (applying Illinois law). Compare Chickering, 22 N.E. at 543 (finding sale where recipients “were vested with the power and rig......