In re Gonzalez, 05–13–00112–CV.

• Decision Date: 04 February 2013
• Docket Number: No. 05–13–00112–CV.,05–13–00112–CV.
• Citation: 391 S.W.3d 679
• Parties: In re Martin GONZALEZ and Mario Arroyo, Relators.
• Court: Texas Court of Appeals

391 S.W.3d 679

In re Martin GONZALEZ and Mario Arroyo, Relators.

No. 05–13–00112–CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas,

Dallas.

Feb. 4, 2013.

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 10–16734; Lynn Cherry, Judge.

Vincent Ndukwe, Jean Lee, Dallas, for appellants.

Gabriella Bendslev, Dallas, and John B. Worley, Rande K. Herrell, Austin, for appellee.

Before Justices MOSELEY, FRANCIS and FILLMORE.

OPINION

Opinion by Justice MOSELEY.

Relators contend the trial judge erred in granting a motion for new trial. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. SeeTex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.