In re Gregory R.
| Citation | 74 N.Y.S.3d 498 (Mem),161 A.D.3d 1167 |
| Decision Date | 30 May 2018 |
| Docket Number | Docket No. D–25477–16,2017–06638 |
| Parties | In the MATTER OF GREGORY R. (Anonymous), appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
161 A.D.3d 1167
74 N.Y.S.3d 498 (Mem)
In the MATTER OF GREGORY R. (Anonymous), appellant.
2017–06638
Docket No. D–25477–16
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Submitted—May 8, 2018
May 30, 2018
Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Dawne Mitchell and Raymond E. Rogers of counsel), for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Daniel Matza–Brown of counsel; Patrick Hill on the brief), for respondent.
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Gregory R. appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Alan Beckoff, J.), dated May 24, 2017. The order of disposition adjudicated Gregory R. a juvenile delinquent, upon an order of fact-finding of the same court dated March 2, 2017, made upon his admission, finding that he had committed acts on November 1, 2016, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation until May 24, 2018.
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the appellant on probation until May 24, 2018, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the appellant on probation until May 24, 2018, has been rendered academic, as the period of placement has expired. However, the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as adjudicated the appellant a juvenile delinquent has not been rendered academic, as there may be collateral consequences resulting from the adjudication of delinquency (see Matter of Kieron C., 140 A.D.3d 1160, 34 N.Y.S.3d 174 ).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dubouse v. Narita
...and conclusory (see Matter of Alphonse v. Alphonse, 189 A.D.3d at 1029, 136 N.Y.S.3d 322 ; Matter of Renee P.-F. v. Frank G., 161 A.D.3d at 1167, 79 N.Y.S.3d 45 ; Matter of Scott v. Powell, 146 A.D.3d at 965–966, 45 N.Y.S.3d 557 ). Accordingly, the Family Court properly granted the motion o......