In re Internal Improvement Fund
Decision Date | 27 April 1897 |
Citation | 24 Colo. 247,48 P. 807 |
Parties | In re INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Advisory opinion in response to communication and interrogatories by the governor.
The opinion is in response to the following communication and interrogatories from the governor, to which was attached senate bill No. 30, section 3 of which reads as follows
'To the Honorable the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado:
'Governor of Colorado.
'Done at Denver, Colorado, this 10th day of April, A. D. 1897.'
James W. McCreery, T. M. Robinson, Byron L. Carr, Atty. Gen., and Calvin E. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., amici curiae.
The questions submitted call for a definition of the words 'internal improvements,' as used in section 12 of the enabling act, being section 193, 1 Mills' Ann. St., and which reads: 'That five per centum of the proceeds of the sales of agricultural public lands lying within said state, which shall be sold by the United States subsequent to the admission of said state into the Union after deducting all the expenses incident to the same, shall be paid to the said state for the purpose of making such internal improvements within said state as the legislature thereof may direct,'--and also the meaning to be given to the same term as used in section 2378, Rev. St. U.S. 1878. In other words, does the phrase as therein used include 'public buildings, such as asylums, statehouses universities, and colleges, or any other public institution of a like character,' so that the proceeds derived from the sources mentioned in these acts may be applied to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State Docks Commission v. Barnes
... ... "at a cost of not exceeding ten million dollars [to] ... engage in the work of internal improvement, or promoting ... [etc.], and operating all harbors and seaports within the ... state ... expenses and interest on the bonds and create a sinking fund ... (Code, § 2558). No officer whose salary exceeds $1,500 shall ... be appointed, nor ... ...
-
Betts v. Comm'rs of the Land Office
...Attorney General, for defendants.--Citing: In re L. E. Waterman Co., 68 N. Y. Supp. 892; Martin v. Francis, 13 Kan. 167; In re Internal Improvement Fund, 24 Colo. 247; In re Internal Improvements, 18 Colo. 317; Sheldon v. Harris, 17 Wash. 35; Roach v. Gooding (Idaho) 81 P. 642; State v. McM......
-
Love v. Clune
... ... determining which of these claimants is entitled to the fund ... in controversy are, in beief, as follows: In August, 1863, ... there was organized an ... ...
-
Ex parte Wisner
...is to be given it, according as one or the other is the subject of the enactment.” The Supreme Court of Colorado, in Re Internal Improvement Fund, 24 Colo. 247, 48 Pac. 808, said: “The Enabling Act does not specify what kind of improvements shall be considered internal improvements; hence w......