IN RE INTERROGATORIES BY RITTER

Decision Date22 March 2010
Docket NumberNo. 10SA43.,10SA43.
Citation227 P.3d 892
PartiesIn re INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED BY GOVERNOR Bill RITTER, JR., CONCERNING the EFFECT OF CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 558 U.S. ___ (2010) ON CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XXIII OF the CONSTITUTION OF the STATE of Colorado.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Daniel D. Domenico, Solicitor General, Maurice G. Knaizer, Deputy Attorney General, Monica M. Márquez, Deputy Attorney General, Matthew D. Grove, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Governor Bill Ritter, Jr., and Secretary of State Bernie Buescher.

Office of Legislative Legal Services, Charles W. Pike, Sharon L. Eubanks, Robert S. Lackner, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for the General Assembly.

Isaacson Rosenbaum P.C., Mark G. Grueskin, Denver, Colorado, Buescher Goldhammer Kelman & Dodge P.C., Joseph M. Goldhammer, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Colorado Education Association, School District 14 Classroom Teachers Association, and Douglas County Federation.

Thomas B. Buescher, Denver, Colorado, Attorney for Colorado Professional Fire Fighters.

Holland & Hart LLP, J. Lee Gray, Greenwood Village, Colorado, Attorneys for Colorado Common Cause.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to section 3 of Article VI of the Colorado Constitution, the Governor submitted two interrogatories to this court on February 9, 2010, concerning the impact of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 876, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2010), on the validity of various provisions of article XXVIII of the Colorado Constitution. The interrogatories are:

Interrogatory No. One:

In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 876, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2010), is Section 6(2) of Article XXVIII of the Colorado Constitution unconstitutional under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as Section 6(2) relates and applies to "funding for electioneering communication" by:

A. Corporations?
B. Labor organizations?

Interrogatory No. Two:

In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 876, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2010), is Section 3(4) of Article XXVIII of the Colorado Constitution unconstitutional under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as Section 3(4) relates and applies to "expenditures expressly advocating the election or defeat of a candidate" by:

A. Corporations?
B. Labor organizations?

We agreed to accept the Governor's interrogatories and ordered that the Governor, the General Assembly, the Attorney General, the Secretary of State, Colorado Common Cause, the League of Woman Voters, the Colorado Bar Association, and any other interested persons be permitted to file simultaneous Opening Briefs in the Supreme Court clerk's office, with simultaneous Answer Briefs to follow. We received briefs from Governor Bill Ritter, Jr., and Secretary of State Bernie Buescher; the Colorado Education Association, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Interrogatory Propounded By Governor John Hickenlooper Concerning the Constitutionality Article
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • October 21, 2013
    ... ... See In re Interrogatories by Governor , 111 Colo. 406, 411, 141 P.2d 899, 90102 (1943). In refusing to assert jurisdiction, this Court explained that answering the Governor's ... See Developmental Pathways v. Ritter, 178 P.3d 524, 535 (Colo.2008) (principle of judicial restraint requires this court to avoid reaching constitutional questions that are not ripe for ... ...
  • Lake Canal Reservoir Co. v. Beethe
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • March 22, 2010
  • Colo. Republican Party v. Williams
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • February 25, 2016
    ...558 U.S. at 365, 130 S.Ct. 876. On March 22, 2010, the Colorado Supreme Court announced In re Interrogatories Propounded by Governor Bill Ritter, Jr., 227 P.3d 892 (Colo.2010), concluding that article XXVIII, sections 3(4) and 6(2)1 were unconstitutional in light of Citizens United. Id. at ......
  • Riddle v. Ritter
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • January 11, 2011
    ...cases not directly on point provide sufficient guidance for the Court to resolve the issue. See In re Interrog. Propounded by Governor Bill Ritter, Jr., 227 P.3d 892 (Colo. 2010) (addressing only sections of Art. XXVIII relating to contributions from corporations and labor organizations); C......
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 12 - § 12.2 • COLORADO CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Guide for Colorado Nonprofit Organizations (CBA) Chapter 12 Regulation of Lobbying and Political Campaign Activities By Nonprofit Organizations
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. ___ (2010) on Certain Provisions of Article XXVIII of the Constitution of the State of Colorado, 227 P.3d 892 (Colo. 2010) (applying Citizens United to Colo. Const. art. XXVII, §§ 3(4)(a) and 6(2) to authorize corporate and union independent spending......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT