In re Jerrina P.
| Decision Date | 25 March 2015 |
| Docket Number | 2014-00047 (Docket Nos. G-25217-11, V-31629-11, V-25217-11) |
| Citation | 2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 02484,6 N.Y.S.3d 124,126 A.D.3d 980 |
| Parties | In the Matter of JERRINA P. (Anonymous). June H. (Anonymous), et al., petitioners-respondents; Shondell N.P. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Shondell N.P. (Anonymous), appellant, v. Jerry G.P. (Anonymous), respondent. (Proceeding No. 2). |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lewis S. Calderon, Jamaica, N.Y., for appellant.
Koehler & Isaacs, New York, N.Y. (Gabriel Greenberg of counsel), for respondents.
Karen P. Simmons, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Anna Kou and Janet Neustaetter of counsel), attorney for the children.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, and BETSY BARROS, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), dated November 25, 2013. The order, after a hearing, in effect, granted the petition of June H. and Litchfield H. for sole custody of the subject child, and denied the mother's petition for sole custody of the subject child.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In a custody proceeding between a parent and a nonparent, the parent has the superior right to custody that cannot be denied unless the nonparent establishes that the parent has relinquished that right due to surrender, abandonment, persistent neglect, unfitness, or other like extraordinary circumstances (see Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 548, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277 ; Matter of Herrera v. Vallejo, 107 A.D.3d 714, 714, 966 N.Y.S.2d 206 ; Matter of Flores v. Flores, 91 A.D.3d 869, 869–870, 936 N.Y.S.2d 676 ; Matter of Robinson v. McNair, 90 A.D.3d 759, 760, 934 N.Y.S.2d 232 ). The burden is on the nonparent to prove the existence of extraordinary circumstances (see Matter of Darlene T., 28 N.Y.2d 391, 394, 322 N.Y.S.2d 231, 271 N.E.2d 215 ; Matter of Ruiz v. Travis, 84 A.D.3d 1242, 1242, 924 N.Y.S.2d 456 ). Where extraordinary circumstances are present, the court must then consider the best interests of the child in awarding custody (see Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d at 548, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277 ; Matter of Flores v. Flores, 91 A.D.3d at 870, 936 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).
Here, the Family Court properly determined that the nonparent petitioners sustained their burden of demonstrating extraordinary circumstances based upon, inter alia, the mother's prolonged separation from the subject child and lack of involvement in the child's life, the mother's failure to contribute to the child's financial support, and the strong emotional bond the child had formed with the petitioners (see Matter of Colon v. Delgado, 106 A.D.3d 414, 415, 963 N.Y.S.2d 663 ; Matter of Robinson v. McNair, 90 A.D.3d at 760, 934 N.Y.S.2d 232 ; Matter of Holmes v. Glover, 68 A.D.3d 868, 869, 890 N.Y.S.2d 629 ; Matter of Barcellos v. Warren–Kidd, 57 A.D.3d 984, 985, 870 N.Y.S.2d 443 ). Moreover, the Family Court's determination that an award of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Culberson v. Fisher
... ... Travis, 84 A.D.3d 1242, 1242, 924 N.Y.S.2d 456 ). Where extraordinary circumstances are found to exist, the court must then consider the best interests of the child in awarding custody (see Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d at 548, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277 ; Matter of Jerrina P. [June H.-Shondell N.P.], 126 A.D.3d 980, 981, 6 N.Y.S.3d 124 ; Matter of Flores v. Flores, 91 A.D.3d at 870, 936 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).Here, the Family Court properly determined that the nonparent petitioners, Yasmin Culberson and Walter Culberson, sustained their burden of demonstrating extraordinary ... ...
-
Roberta P. v. Vanessa J.P.
... ... By contrast, the father has not cared for 140 A.D.3d 458 the child, on a daily basis, for any length of time, has had sporadic contact, and has not provided financial support for the child's care (see Matter of Jerrina P. [June H.-Shondell N.P.], 126 A.D.3d 980, 6 N.Y.S.3d 124 [2d Dept.2015] ; Matter of Carton v. Grimm, 51 A.D.3d 1111, 1113, 857 N.Y.S.2d 775 [3d Dept.2008] ).The father did not challenge petitioner's standing to seek custody as a grandmother under DRL 72, or raise any constitutional arguments at ... ...
-
King v. King
... ... Cohen, 181 A.D.3d 965, 967, 122 N.Y.S.3d 642 ; Matter of Williams v. Frank, 148 A.D.3d at 816, 49 N.Y.S.3d 703 ; Matter of Sofia S.S. [Goldie M.-Elizabeth C.], 145 A.D.3d 787, 789, 43 N.Y.S.3d 469 ; Matter of Jerrina P. [June H.-Shondell N.P.], 126 A.D.3d 980, 981, 6 N.Y.S.3d 124 ). Moreover, the Family Court's determination that the best interests of the child would be served by an award of sole physical custody and final decision-making authority to the petitioner, with parental access to the father, is ... ...
-
Geter v. Gray
... ... Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 544, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277 ). The burden is on the nonparent to prove the existence of extraordinary circumstances (Matter of Jerrina P. [June H.-Shondell N.P.], 126 A.D.3d 980, 981, 6 N.Y.S.3d 124 ; see Matter of Darlene T., 28 N.Y.2d 391, 394, 322 N.Y.S.2d 231, 271 N.E.2d 215 ; Matter of Brown v. Zuzierla, 73 A.D.3d 765, 766, 900 N.Y.S.2d 414 ). Only if the nonparent meets this burden does the court determine whether the best ... ...