In re Kimball's Will
Decision Date | 13 July 1898 |
Parties | In re KIMBALL'S WILL. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
In the matter of the will of Henry C. Kimball, questions arose as to its construction, and were stated for the opinion of the supreme court.
Edwards & Angell, Albert Gerald, and Frank L. Hinckley, for parties.
This is a case stated for the opinion of the court. The questions involved arise on the will of Henry C. Kimball, late of Providence, deceased, which bears date June 8, 1876. The third clause of the will gives to the testator's son, Frank Freeman Kimball, the testator's watch, chain, clothing, certain jewelry, a silver salver, and three-fourths of a safe and cabinet. Frank Freeman Kimball died before the testator, so that this legacy lapsed; and the question is made whether the articles specified fall into the residue under paragraph 5 of the third clause, or into the residue under the fourth clause. Paragraph 5 of the third clause purports to dispose only of the rest and residue of the testator's household goods and effects, including books, pictures, furniture, and the like. Household goods and effects, even as thus defined, cannot be held to include a watch, chain, clothing, and jewelry; and our opinion, therefore, is that these articles must be regarded as falling into the residue under the fourth clause, which embraces the residue of the testator's property generally, and that the silver salver and the share of the safe and cabinet must be regarded as falling into the residue under paragraph 5 of the third clause, as household effects.
The fourth and fifth clauses of the will, so far as material, are as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Armor v. Frey
......344; Thomas v. Miller, 43 N. E. (Ill.) 848; Griffiths v. Griffiths, 64 N.E. 1069;. Munro v. Collins, 95 Mo. 33; In re. Keniston's Will, 73 Vt. 75; Smith v. Bell, . 6 Peters 68; Giles v. Little, 104 U.S. 291;. Partee v. Thomas, 11 F. 769; Rice v. Moyer, . 97 Ia. 96; ......
-
Industrial Nat. Bank of R. I. v. Glocester Manton Free Public Library of Glocester
...to the contrary, it would pass as intestate property to the heirs at law. Petition of Phillips, 25 R.I. 254, 55 A. 696; Re Will of Kimball, 20 R.I. 619, 40 A. 847; Church v. Church, 15 R.I. 138, 23 A. 302. This common law rule was changed with the enactment of G.L.1896, chap. 203, sec. 7, n......
-
Chile v. Beck
...... This controversy arises from the construction by a Superior Court justice of the May 29, 1969 will of Dorothy Bateman Beck (Dorothy), who at the time of her death in November 1972 owned the Bateman Farm, a parcel of land of almost sixty acres ......
-
Wash. Trust Co. v. Arnold
...court held that the subsequent provisions indicated no intention on his part to limit the unconditional nature thereof. In Re Will of Kimball, 20 R.I. 619, 40 A. 847, the court gave effect to the absolute and technical terms used in the will, which also expressly recognized the first taker'......