In re Ladd
Decision Date | 07 May 1896 |
Citation | 74 F. 31 |
Parties | In re LADD. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska |
A. J Sawyer, U.S. Dist. Atty., and E. H. Crowder, Major and Judge Advocate U.S. Army, for petitioner.
Arthur M. Bartlett, pro se.
The facts of this case, as gathered from the record submitted to the court, appear to be as follows:
The petitioner, Eugene F. Ladd, is an officer of the United States army, holding the position of first lieutenant in the ninth cavalry now stationed at Ft. Robinson, which is situated in Dawes county, state of Nebraska. By a special order issued under date of January 4, 1896, by Col. Biddle, then in command at said fort, Lieut. Ladd was detailed on special duty as officer in charge of the post exchange established at the named fort, which since November 14, 1876, has been a military post of the United States. That post exchanges are established and maintained in pursuance of special regulations issued by the war department. That since the 25th of July, 1895, the following, among other, regulations have been, and continue to be, in force, and to be applicable to the post exchange at Ft. Robinson as well as to other posts throughout the country:
It further appears that for some years past there has been maintained at Ft. Robinson, in one of the buildings on the military reservation, a post exchange, conducted under the regulations issued by direction of the war department; that, under the recommendation of the exchange council, the commanding officer at Ft. Robinson has authorized the keeping and sale of beer and light wines at the post exchange, and the same have been so kept and sold under the supervision of the several officers in charge of said post exchange, including the petitioner in this case. It further appears that, under the provisions of the statutes of Nebraska, no person within the jurisdiction of the state is permitted to sell or give away any intoxicating liquors, including wine or beer, unless duly licensed so to do by the county commissioners, or by the proper city or town authorities; and parties so selling without a proper license are liable to punishment, and may be brought before a justice of the peace for the purpose of preliminary examination, and, if cause exists, may be held to answer at the next term of the district court. It further appears that on the 31st of March, 1896, an information was filed before Henry Tisch, a justice of the peace residing in Dawes county, Neb., charging that the petitioner, with one Alfred Bratton, 'did on or about the 22d day of March, 1896, on the Ft. Robinson military reservation, in said Dawes county, unlawfully sell and deliver to Lemiel Cogvill one glass of malt liquor, to wit, beer, and did on or about the 22d of March, 1896, on the Ft. Robinson military reservation, in said Dawes county, unlawfully sell and deliver to Albert Bettis one glass of malt liquor, to wit, beer, and did on or about the 22d day of March, 1896, on the Ft. Robinson military reservation, in said Dawes county, unlawfully sell and deliver to William Washington one glass of malt liquor, to wit, beer. ' And thereupon the said justice issued a warrant of arrest, under which the sheriff of Dawes county, Arthur M. Bartlett, arrested Lieut. Ladd, and took him before the justice, by whom the hearing was fixed for the 9th day of May. On the same day, to wit, March 31, 1896, an information was laid before the same justice of the peace, charging that there was kept on the Ft. Robinson military reservation, for purposes of sale, certain beer, wine, and whisky; that the same were in and about the building known as the 'Post Exchange,' and were in the possession of Eugene F. Ladd and Alfred Bratton, who were selling the same without having paid for and obtained the license required by the statutes of Nebraska. Upon this information a warrant was issued to the sheriff of Dawes county, upon which Lieut. Ladd was arrested, taken before the justice, and the hearing fixed for the 9th day of May. The return of the sheriff shows that under this warrant he seized certain beer and wine, but nothing else. For the purpose of freeing himself from the arrests made on the warrants above described, Lieut. Ladd made application to this court for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that the laws of the state of Nebraska regulating the sale of liquors, spirituous and malt, have no application to the military reservation known as 'Ft. Robinson'; that the justice of the peace who issued the warrants of arrest for acts done on the reservation was wholly without jurisdiction; and that the arrest and consequent detention of petitioner by the sheriff of Dawes county were without authority of law. The application having been granted, the writ issued to Arthur M. Bartlett, who has made due return thereto, setting forth the warrants issued to him by the justice of the peace, the information upon which they were issued, and copies of his returns, showing the arrest of petitioner thereon.
From this statement of the facts, it appears that the right of the sheriff of Dawes county to hold the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Mcintosh
...29 L. Ed. 264; Arlington Hotel Co. v. Fant, 278 U. S. 439, 49 S. Ct. 227, 73 L. Ed. 447; Steele v. Halligan (D. C.) 229 F. 1011; In re Ladd (C. C.) 74 F. 31, 41. Counsel for the defendants has raised various objections to the constitutionality and applicability of this Virginia act to the i......
-
Stevens v. McClaughry
...and the practice under them which has prevailed for years in In re Mayfield, 141 U.S. 107, 116, 11 Sup.Ct. 939, 35 L.Ed. 635; In re Ladd (C.C.) 74 F. 31, 42; re Waite (D.C.) 81 F. 359, 362, 372; Mackey v. Miller, 126 F. 161, 163, 62 C.C.A. 139; Ex parte Peeke (D.c.) 144 F. 1016-- there woul......
-
McEachin v. United States
...motion was heard and denied by the court immediately before trial. 3. United States v. Watkins, 22 F.2d 437 (N.D. Ca1.1927); In re Ladd, 74 F. 31 (C.C.Neb.1896); United States v. Meagher, 37 F. 875 (C.C.Tex. 1888); State v. Mack, 23 Nev. 359, 47 P. 763 (1897); State v. Morris, 76 N.J.Law 22......
-
Steele v. Halligan
...v. Old Point Comfort Hotel (C.C.) 54 F. 604, 607. The cession by the state includes judicial as well as legislative jurisdiction. In re Ladd (C.C.) 74 F. 31. While criminal laws of the state have been held to have no force after the cession within the territory ceded, unless adopted by legi......