In re Lennington, A20-0630

Decision Date22 September 2020
Docket NumberA20-0630
Citation948 N.W.2d 685 (Mem)
Parties IN RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Peter Gilbert LENNINGTON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0223311.
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court
ORDER

Natalie E. Hudson, Associate Justice

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action and a supplementary petition alleging that respondent Peter Gilbert Lennington has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, engaging in a pattern of client-related misconduct impacting eight clients that involved neglect, non-communication, failing to clarify a fee, failing to deposit advance fee payments and a filing fee into trust, failing to refund or timely refund unearned fees and a filing fee, charging an unreasonable fee, and failing to return original documents to clients; and failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigations. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.4(a)(3), 1.4(a)(4), 1.5(a), 1.5(b), 1.15(a), 1.15(c)(4), 1.15(c)(5), 1.16(d), 8.1(b).

Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent withdraws his previously filed answers, unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition and the supplementary petition, and waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Respondent also agrees to refund unearned fees to four clients listed in the stipulation for discipline. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 6 months and that respondent's reinstatement be conditioned on having refunded the unearned fees to the four clients listed in the stipulation for discipline.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Peter Gilbert Lennington is suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for 6 months.

2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement under Rule 18(a)(d), RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility, see Rule 18(e)(2), RLPR ; satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements, see ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • In re Lennington
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • January 19, 2022
    ...we suspended Lennington for 6 months for engaging in a pattern of client-related misconduct impacting eight clients. In re Lennington , 948 N.W.2d 685, 685–86 (Minn. 2020) (order). The misconduct at issue involved neglecting client matters, failing to communicate with clients, failing to cl......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT