In re Marriage Cases

Decision Date15 May 2008
Docket NumberNo. S147999.,S147999.
CitationIn re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757, 183 P. 3d 384, 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d. 683 (Cal. 2008)
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
PartiesIn re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals.]<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL>

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
143 cases
  • People v. Douglas
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • May 3, 2018
    ... ... the application in these circumstances of the so-called "mixed motive" or "dual motive" analysis, which arose in employment discrimination cases as a way for defendant-employers to show that they would have taken an adverse action against a plaintiff-employee whether or not an impermissible ... Windsor (2013) 570 U.S. 744, 133 S.Ct. 2675, 186 L.Ed.2d 808, which held that the Defense of Marriage Act's definition of marriage as excluding same-sex partners violated equal protection and due process. (See also Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) 576 ... ...
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 23, 2021
    ... ... It provides in part: "This section shall not apply to cases in which sentencing occurs pursuant to Section 1170.12, subdivisions (b) to (i), inclusive, of Section 667, or Section 667.61, [ 3 ] or to cases ... statute from any meaningful equal protection review." ( In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 831, fn. 54, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384 ; see Shay, Similarly Situated (2011) 18 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 581, 624 [" ... ...
  • People v. Thompson
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • December 1, 2016
    ... ... " ‘[N]ot all who oppose the death penalty are subject to removal for cause in capital cases; those who firmly believe that the death penalty is unjust may nevertheless 210 Cal.Rptr.3d 690 serve as jurors in capital cases so long as they ... Although defendant is correct that we strive to interpret statutes (such as § 1054) so as to avoid constitutional problems (see In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 800, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384 ), because we find defendant had no constitutional right to discovery from her ... ...
  • Varnum v. Brien
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • April 3, 2009
    ... ...         David James Hanson of Hofmeyer & Hanson, P.C., Fayette, and Joshua K. Baker of Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, Manassas, VA, for amici curiae James Q. Wilson, et al., Legal and Family Scholars ...         Timm W. Reid of Galligan, ... exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments shall exercise any function appertaining to either of the others, except in cases hereinafter expressly directed or permitted."). Among other basic principles essential to our form of government, the constitution defines certain ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Cure and Reinstatement of Home Mortgages in Chapter 13: Florida's Bright-Line Rule is Not So Bright
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • November 20, 2014
    ...at least up until the time of the foreclosure sale. See In re Glenn, 760 F.2d 1428 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 849, 106 S.Ct. 144, 88 L.Ed.2d 119 (1985); Matter of Clark, 738 F.2d 869 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 849, 106 S.Ct. 144, 88 L.Ed.2d 119 (1985). The Roach case......
  • Risks and Activities Covered by Insurance Policies
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • May 28, 2017
    ...Div. 1954). 4Id. 5Blasiar, Inc. v. Freeman’s Fund Ins. Co., 76 Cal.4th 748, 757 (1999); California Practice Guide: Insurance Litigation, Exclusions From Coverage Ch. 6B-F. 6Blasier, 76 Cal.4th at 757. ...
40 books & journal articles
  • Is same-sex marriage a threat to traditional marriages?: How courts struggle with the question.
    • United States
    • Washington University Global Studies Law Review No. 10-1, January 2011
    • January 1, 2011
    ...Goodridge v. Dept. of Pub. Health, 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass. 2003) (see infra notes 10, 48-50 and accompanying text); In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. 2008) (see infra notes 53, 55-56 and accompanying text); Kerrigan v. Comm'r of Pub. Health, 957 A.2d 407 (Conn. 2008) (see infra notes 5......
  • Equal Protection
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXIII-2, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or AIDS status must be submitted for voter approval); see also In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384, 442 (Cal. 2008) (holding sexual orientation as a suspect class subject to strict scrutiny for the purposes of the California Constitution). 37......
  • Laura A. Rosenbury & Jennifer E. Rothman, Sex in and Out of Intimacy
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 59-4, 2010
    • Invalid date
    ...ruled that it was unconstitutional for the state to deny same-sex couples access to state-recognized marriage, In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384, 452-53 (Cal. 2008), and thousands of same- sex couples subsequently legally married in California before voters passed a referendum limiting civ......
  • Appendix 5: State Laws Relating to Marriage
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Transgender Persons and the Law
    • May 14, 2015
    ...Perry, 133 S.Ct. 786, 184 L.Ed.2d 526 (2014); and Cal. Fam. Code § 308.5, declared unconstitutional by In re Marriage Cases , 43 Cal.4 th 757, 183 P.3d 384, 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683 (2008). Cal. Fam. Code § 308(a) passed in 2009 declared that same-sex marriages legally entered into on or before......
  • Get Started for Free
1 provisions
  • Chapter 102, AJR 29 – Federal income tax: same-sex couples.
    • United States
    • US session laws and acts California Session Laws
    • January 1, 2010
    ...Statutes of 2001, Chapter 421 of the Statutes of 2003, and Chapter 802 of the Statutes of 2006) and case law (In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757; and Strauss v. Horton (2009) 46 Cal.4th 364) confirm that registered domestic partners and married same-sex couples whose marriages remai......