In re Miller, 2012–03–07–01.
| Decision Date | 07 March 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. 2012–03–07–01.,2012–03–07–01. |
| Citation | 723 S.E.2d 211,397 S.C. 7 |
| Parties | In the Matter of C. Kevin MILLER, Respondent. |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect respondent's clients' interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent has filed a return objecting to the issuance of an order placing him on interim suspension and appointing an attorney to protect his clients' interests.
IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jason Michael Imhoff, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent's client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain. Mr. Imhoff shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent's clients. Mr. Imhoff may make disbursements from respondent's trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.
This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Jason Michael Imhoff, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.
Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Jason Michael Imhoff, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent's mail and the authority to direct that respondent's mail be delivered to Mr. Imhoff's office.
This appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless request is made to this Court for an extension.
/s/Jean H. Toal, Chief Justice
To continue reading
Request your trial
- McLeod v. Starnes
- In re Jordan, Appellate Case No. 2012–211666
- In re Jordan, 27101.
-
In re Miller
...respondent from the practice of law in this state, retroactive to March 7, 2012, the date of his interim suspension. See In re Miller, 397 S.C. 7, 723 S.E.2d 211 (2012). The following matters are addressed in the Agreement.Matter A Respondent failed to timely respond to an initial inquiry b......