In re Miranda, NM-01-044.
| Decision Date | 04 December 2001 |
| Docket Number | 99-17081.,NM-01-046.,99-10346.,No. NM-01-044.,98-10524.,NM-01-048.,NM-01-045.,00-11356.,NM-01-047.,NM-01-044. |
| Citation | 285 B.R. 344 |
| Parties | In re Miranda, Skehen v. Miranda. In re Rivera, Skehen v. Rivera. Anderson, In re, Skehen v. Anderson. Bonner, In re, Skehen v. Bonner. Horlick, In re Skehen v. Horlick. Byrd, In re Skehen v. Byrd. Romero, In re, Skehen v. Romero. Deutsawe, In re, Skehen v. Deutsawe. C'Hair, In re, Skehen v. C'Hair. |
| Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit |
Appeal from D.N.M.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
14 cases
-
In re Soussis
...permitted to keep the fees collected at the time of each plan payment irrespective of whether a debtor's case is confirmed. In re Miranda , 2001 WL 1538003, at *2 ; In re Dickens , 513 B.R. at 912 ; In re Evans , 615 B.R. at 297. Some courts look to § 1326 in the first instance and find the......
-
Goodman v. Doll (In re Doll)
...section 503(b)," which deals instead with certain specified administrative expenses. See Skehen v. Miranda (In re Miranda), 285 B.R. 344, 2001 WL 1538003, at *2 (BAP 10th Cir. 2001) (unpublished) ("The standing Chapter 13 trustee's percentage fee is not an administrative claim within the me......
-
In re Lewis
...any statutory commission from plan payments made in a case in which no confirmation order is entered. In re Miranda, 285 B.R. 344 (Table), 2001 WL 1538003 (10th Cir. BAP 2001); Matter of Ward, 132 B.R. 417 (Bankr. D.Neb.1991). 18. Had I concluded otherwise, other thorny issues come to mind.......
-
In re Evans
...the difference in the statutes entitles the trustee to retain the fees. This argument is not persuasive for the reasons discussed below.In Miranda , a chapter 13 trustee appealed an order from a bankruptcy court denying allowance of the trustee fee on payments received from the debtors in c......
Request a trial to view additional results