In re Nwaneri

Decision Date07 June 2018
Docket NumberA16-0057
Citation912 N.W.2d 882 (Mem)
Parties IN RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Patrick Chinedu NWANERI, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0322003.
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court
ORDER

On June 7, 2017, we suspended respondent Patrick Chinedu Nwaneri from the practice of law for a minimum of 30 days, effective June 21, 2017. In re Nwaneri , 896 N.W.2d 518, 527 (Minn. 2017). We stated that by June 7, 2018, Nwaneri was required to file proof of his successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility and that failure to do so would result in automatic re-suspension, as provided in Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Nwaneri , 896 N.W.2d at 527.

We conditionally reinstated Nwaneri on July 21, 2017. In re Nwaneri , 899 N.W.2d 185, 185–86 (Minn. 2017) (order). Our order reinstating Nwaneri repeated the requirement from our earlier opinion regarding the deadline for filing proof with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts of successful completion of the professional-responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Id. We again stated that failure to do so would result in automatic re-suspension, pending successful completion of the examination, as provided in Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR. Nwaneri , 899 N.W.2d at 186.

Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR, provides that, unless waived by this court, a lawyer who has been suspended for 90 days or less "must, within one year from the date of the suspension order, successfully complete such written examination as may be required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility." The professional-responsibility examination referred to in Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR, is the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE). See Rule 4.A(5), Rules for Admission to the Bar. "Except upon motion and for good cause shown, failure to successfully complete this examination shall result in automatic suspension of the lawyer effective one year after the date of the original suspension order." Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

Nwaneri did not file proof of successful completion of the MPRE by June 7, 2018. Instead, on May 22, 2018, Nwaneri filed a motion seeking additional time, until November 1, 2018, to provide proof of successful completion of the MPRE and a motion for a speedy hearing of his extension motion. Nwaneri took the MPRE in August 2017 and March 2018, but did not receive a passing score on either exam. He argues there is good cause for an extension of time because he was unable to adequately prepare for the March 2018 MPRE due pressing family obligations that required him to travel out of the country during the winter before the exam and the time it took him to prepare for and attend a sentencing hearing that was scheduled 2 days before the exam.

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility opposes Nwaneri’s request for additional time in which to successfully complete the MPRE.

We have routinely denied attorneys’ requests for additional time to provide proof of having passed the MPRE. See , e.g. , In re Swanson , 877 N.W.2d 190, 190 (Minn. 2016) (order) (denying motion for additional time when an attorney claimed he mistakenly thought the MPRE was given at the same time as the state bar exam); In re McCormick , 837 N.W.2d 493, 494–95 (Minn. 2013) (order) (denying motion for additional time when an attorney who took and failed the MPRE and said he failed because he was ill on the day of the exam); In re Ruhland , 833 N.W.2d 401, 401...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Nwaneri
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • August 24, 2022
    ...of the written examination on the subject of professional responsibility as required by his conditional reinstatement. In re Nwaneri , 912 N.W.2d 882 (Minn. 2018). On July 2, 2018, the Director issued an admonition against Nwaneri for failing to notify a client that he was suspended.Nwaneri......
  • In re Kennedy
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • November 1, 2018
    ...have routinely denied attorneys’ requests for additional time to provide proof of having passed the MPRE. See , e.g. , In re Nwaneri , 912 N.W.2d 882, 883–84 (Minn. 2018) (order) (denying motion for additional time when attorney sat for the exam twice and failed and claimed he was unable to......
  • In re McCloud
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • March 10, 2022
    ...to health reasons and professional obligations and took but did not receive a passing score on the August 2018 MPRE); In re Nwaneri , 912 N.W.2d 882, 883–84 (Minn. 2018) (order) (denying motion and suspending attorney who sat for the MPRE twice and failed and claimed he was unable to adequa......
  • In re Nwaneri, A16-0057
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • January 8, 2019
    ...of his extension motion. We denied the motions and revoked Nwaneri's conditional reinstatement, effective June 17, 2018. In re Nwaneri , 912 N.W.2d 882, 883 (Minn. 2018) (order). Nwaneri has now filed proof that he has successfully completed the MPRE. The Director of the Office of Lawyers P......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT