In re Opinion of the Justices-Adjutant Gen.

Decision Date16 July 1920
Citation112 A. 525
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court
PartiesIn re OPINION OF THE JUSTICES-ADJUTANT GENERAL.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

The Adjutant General cannot be removed from office except upon address by the Legislature.

(Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)

Answers to Questions Propounded to the Justices of the Supreme Court by the Governor and Council.

G. F. Morris, of Lancaster (Drew, Shurtleff, Morris & Oakes, and Irving A. Hinkley, all of Lancaster, on the brief), for Adjutant General.

Oscar L. Young, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM. July 2, 1919, the Governor and Council adopted the following resolution:

Resolved, that the Supreme Court be requested to render an opinion as soon as possible as to whether, under the Constitution and laws of the state of New Hampshire, the Governor can legally remove the Adjutant General at his pleasure, and for such further interpretation of any of the provisions of the Constitution and laws bearing on the matter as it may be the pleasure of the Supreme Court to render.

The Justices being informed by the Secretary of State of this action of the Governor and Council heard the parties at Concord July 11, 1919, and subsequently submitted the following To his Excellency the Governor and the Honorable Council:

As has been frequently said by the justices of this court our constitutional advisory power is limited to the expression of opinion upon important questions of law necessary to be determined by the body requiring advice. 67 N. H. 600, 43 Atl. 1074. The resolution which we have been informed has been adopted by you requiring our opinion upon the question "whether the Governor can legally remove the Adjutant General of the state" fails to make clear what action of your body is dependent upon the answer to that question. But upon the assumption that our opinion may be of use to you in the performance of the duties legally imposed upon you we herewith respectfully answer.

Our opinion is that the Governor has not the power to remove the Adjutant General, a duly commissioned officer of the militia, except upon the address of both houses of the Legislature. Const. pt. 2, art. 52(53); 62 N. H. 706.

While the Secretary of State is the recording officer of the council, the verity of the record is established by the signatures of the members of the council. Const. pt. 2. art. 46(47), 63(64).

The informality by which information of your action has reached us has not been permitted to prevent prompt...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • In re Op. of the Justices
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 12 Julio 2018
    ...the budget he submitted to the legislature. See Opinion of the Justices, 113 N.H. at 88-89, 302 A.2d 112 ; see also Opinion of the Justices, 79 N.H. 535, 112 A. 525 (1919).Although we remain sensitive to the importance of confining our advisory opinions to solemn occasions, we are satisfied......
  • Opinion of the Justices
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 16 Enero 1958
    ... ... 549 ... OPINION OF THE JUSTICES ... Supreme Court of New Hampshire ... Jan. 16, 1958 ...         [101 N.H. 559] Louis C. Wyman, Atty. Gen., and Warren E. Waters, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State ...         Sulloway, Hollis, Godfrey & Soden, Concord, for Public Service Co. of ... ...
  • In re Opinion of the Justices
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 4 Octubre 1927
    ...first question. Opinion of the Justices, 67 N. H. 600, 43 A. 1074; Opinion of the Justices, 75 N. H. 613, 72 A. 754; Opinion of the Justices, 79 N. H. 535, 112 A. 525. ROBERT J. LESLIE P. SNOW. JOHN E. ALLEN. THOMAS L. MARBLE. OLIVER W. BRANCH. ...
  • Opinion Of The Justices.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • 14 Octubre 1949
    ...may be of use to you in the performance of the duties legally imposed upon you we herewith respectfully answer.’ In re Opinion of the Justices, 79 N.H. 535, 112 A. 525, 526. See also, In re Opinion of Justices, 74 N.H. 606, 607, 608, 68 A. 873; In re Opinion of Justices, 75 N.H. 613, 615, 7......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT