In re Parkinson
Decision Date | 06 June 1939 |
Docket Number | 35670 |
Citation | 128 S.W.2d 1023,344 Mo. 715 |
Parties | In re Disbarment Proceedings Against John G. Parkinson, Sr |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Proceeding dismissed and respondent discharged.
Frank Hollingsworth, William H. Becker, Lester G. Seacat and E. W. Jones for informants.
(1) The evidence shows that the respondent is guilty as charged in Counts 5, 6 and 7, and for that reason Exceptions 4, 5 and 6 to the report of the commissioner should be sustained. As to Count 5. Secs. 30, 31, 41, Rule 35. As to Count 6. Sec. 34, Rule 35. As to Count 7. Secs. 27, 28, Rule 35. (2) The failure of respondent to call as a witness his employee Oscar Payne, creates an inference that Payne's testimony would have been damaging to respondent because Payne was peculiarly available to respondent as a witness. Chavaries v. Natl. Life & Acc. Co., 110 S.W.2d 795; McInnis v. St. L.-So. Inc., 108 S.W.2d 116. (3) The deposition of Oscar Payne in another case was competent. State v. Benson, 8 S.W.2d 53; State v Menz, 106 S.W.2d 448; 12 C. J. 637; 22 C. J. 399. (4) This court should review the record and the evidence in this matter de novo and find the accused guilty or innocent of the charge contained in the information, notwithstanding the report, findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations of the commissioner. (a) This court here in exercising its original jurisdiction as the trier of the facts and the report and recommendation of the special commissioner are only advisory and not in any sense binding on this court. State ex inf. v. Arkansas Lbr. Co., 260 Mo. 269.
James A. Reed and Robert Ingraham for respondent.
(1) The report of the commissioner that the evidence is insufficient to show that respondent is guilty of professional misconduct on each and every charge and recommending that the information be dismissed and respondent discharged was overwhelmingly sustained by the credible evidence in the case. (2) The charges should be dismissed unless sustained by clear and convincing evidence and in weighing the evidence the findings of the commissioner are entitled to great weight. Although cases of this nature are called neither "civil" nor "criminal," yet as to the degree of proof required they are analogous to criminal charges. The proof, if not required to be beyond a reasonable doubt, should at least be clear and convincing, not mere suspicion or conjecture. The rule applicable to circumstantial evidence in conspiracy charges should apply, i. e., that if the evidence is as consistent with innocence as with guilt, the charge is not proved.
En Banc.
This is an original proceeding, instituted by leave, on the information of the General Chairman of Bar Committees, and the Advisory Committee to said General Chairman (under rule No. 36 of this court), charging John G. Parkinson, Sr. (who will hereinafter be referred to as respondent), a licensed and practicing attorney at St. Joseph, with professional misconduct, the object of which is to revoke his license as an attorney, and to forever disbar him. The information is in seven counts, the first four of which charge specific acts of professional misconduct; whereas the remaining three are general in character. The fourth count is no longer involved, as the committee offered no evidence in support of the charge therein contained. Omitting formal portions, and the fourth count in its entirety, the charging parts of said information are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Buder
... ... the good must be presumed and inferred. The Commissioner ... erred in not observing and following such rule. Ray ... County Savings Bank v. Hutton, 224 Mo. 42, 123 S.W. 47; ... Chapman v. McIlwreath, 77 Mo. 38; In re ... Parkinson, 344 Mo. 715, 128 S.W.2d 1023; Hendricks ... v. Calloway, 211 Mo. 536, 111 S.W. 60; ... Missouri-Lincoln Trust Co. v. Third Natl. Bank, 154 ... Mo.App. 89, 133 S.W. 357; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Grand ... Natl. Bank, 69 F.2d 177. (10) The burden of proof was ... upon Informants to ... ...
-
Speiser, In re, 29330
... ... The findings and conclusions of the Special Commissioner, while helpful, are advisory only and not binding on us. To the contrary, we must review the record de novo and make our own findings of fact and conclusions of law. In re Parkinson, (en Banc), 344 Mo. 715, 128 S.W.2d 1023; In re Kaemmerer, Mo.App., 178 S.W.2d 474; In re Mason, Mo.App., 203 S.W.2d 750, certiorari granted, see State ex rel. Morton v. Cave, 359 Mo. 72, 220 S.W.2d 45 ... We now consider the facts: ... Patterson Case ... ...
-
In re Mason
... ... required to make our own findings of fact and conclusions of ... law, and to render judgment thereon, in this kind of case ... The findings and conclusions of the special commissioner are ... not binding on us, but they are advisory and helpful. In ... re Parkinson, 344 Mo. 715, 128 S.W.2d 1023, loc. cit ... The ... report of the special commissioner, regarding the evidence ... heard with respect to the charges, and the law applicable ... thereto, is painstaking and accurate. Each section of said ... report will be quoted herein and ... ...
-
State ex rel. Huse v. Haden
... ... persuasive (or as sometimes said, "advisory and ... helpful") but not binding on the court. [State ex inf ... v. Arkansas Lumber Co., 260 Mo. 212, 169 S.W. 145; State ex ... inf. v. K. C. College of Medicine & Surgery, 315 Mo. 101, 285 ... S.W. 980, 46 A. L. R. 1472; In re Parkinson, 344 Mo ... 715, 128 S.W.2d 1023.] We have reviewed the testimony, and ... are of the opinion that the Special Commissioner's ... findings of fact are supported by the record, and they are, ... accordingly, approved and adopted ... The ... question presented is whether, ... ...