In re Phillips, Case Number: 317

Decision Date04 April 1939
Docket NumberCase Number: 317
Citation188 Okla. 305,1939 OK 185,109 P.2d 234
PartiesIn re PHILLIPS
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court
Syllabus

¶0 ATTORNEY AND CLIENT--Disciplinary proceedings against attorney--Sufficiency of evidence to sustain findings of Board of Governors of State Bar.

Findings of Board of Governors of State Bar will not be disturbed by Supreme Court unless against clear weight of evidence.

Proceeding to review the findings and recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Oklahoma that Bryan Phillips be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years. Findings approved and respondent suspended.

Bryan Phillips, of Anadarko, pro se.

Carl Kruse, of Enid, and V. P. Crowe, of Oklahoma City, for State Bar of Oklahoma.

GIBSON, J.

¶1 This matter comes here on the petition of Bryan Phillips, attorney at law and a member of the State Bar of Oklahoma, hereinafter referred to as respondent, to review the findings and recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for the period of three years.

¶2 After hearing, the Board of Governors of the State Bar, among other things, concluded:

"That respondent embezzled and appropriated to his own use the sum of $24.10 from the proceeds of a collection made for his client and is guilty of violating his oath of office as a member of the Bar; and is also guilty of willful violation of his duties as an attorney at law; all in violation of Causes Nos. Four and Eight for disbarment."

¶3 An examination of the entire record discloses that the findings of fact and the conclusions made by the Board of Governors are not against the clear weight of the evidence. In suck case the findings and conclusions of the Board of Governors will not be disturbed. In re Tillman, 157 Okla. 166, 11 P.2d 511; In re Purdy, 166 Okla. 31, 25 P.2d 1096; In re Hills, 170 Okla. 427, 40 P.2d 1031; In re Murray, 178 Okla. 86, 61 P.2d 1051.

¶4 It is therefore the order of this court that the respondent, Bryan Phillips, be and is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the state of Oklahoma for a period of three years.

¶5 BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, CORN, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. DANNER, J., absent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Donahoe v. Alcorn
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • September 10, 1940
    ...1940 OK 348108 P.2d 786188 Okla. 305 DONAHOE v. ALCORNCase Number: 29489Supreme Court of OklahomaDecided: September 10, 1940 Syllabus 0 ... Upon hearing his motion it was denied. He presents the case on appeal. Although the order of appearance is reversed in this court, we ... ...
  • In re Phillips
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1939
    ...109 P.2d 234 188 Okla. 305, 1939 OK 185 In re PHILLIPS. No. 317.Supreme Court of OklahomaApril 4, 1939 ...          Rehearing ... Denied Oct. 24, 1939 ... are not against the clear weight of the evidence. In such ... case the findings and conclusions of the Board of Governors ... will not be disturbed. In re Tillman, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT