In re Pittman, 229P02.

Decision Date15 August 2002
Docket NumberNo. 229P02.,229P02.
Citation356 N.C. 163,568 S.E.2d 608
PartiesIn re Jakel PITTMAN, A Minor Child DOB: 10-03-99.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

J. Richard Hamlett, II, Tarboro, for Lekeshia Harris. Jayne B. Norwood, for Nash Co. DSS.

Judith L. Kornegay, Rocky Mount, for Guardian ad Litem.

Francisco J. Bricio, Cary, for James Pittman.

Prior report: 149 N.C.App. 756, 561 S.E .2d 560.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (James Pittman) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of August 2002."

To continue reading

Request your trial
49 cases
  • Little v. Lewis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • 27 Agosto 2012
    ...conclusions of law." In re Pittman, 149 N.C. App.756, 762, 561 S.E.2d 560, 565 (citation omitted), disc, review denied, 356 N.C. 163, 568 S.E.2d 608 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 982 (2003). "[I]f so, the trial court's conclusions of law are binding on appeal." State v. West, 119 N.C.App. ......
  • State Carolina v. Boozer
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 15 Marzo 2011
    ...the court's conclusions of law.” In re Pittman, 149 N.C.App. 756, 762, 561 S.E.2d 560, 565 (citation omitted), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 163, 568 S.E.2d 608 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 982, 123 S.Ct. 1799, 155 L.Ed.2d 673 (2003). “[I]f so, the trial court's conclusions of law are bin......
  • In re L.O.K.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 15 Noviembre 2005
    ...et seq., is that the court's primary concern must be the child's best interest."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 163, 568 S.E.2d 608-09 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 982, 123 S.Ct. 1799, 155 L.Ed.2d 673 (2003). When it is not in the juvenile's best interest to be retur......
  • In re T.S., III
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 20 Junio 2006
    ...___ N.C.App. ___, ___ 619 S.E.2d 583 (2005); In re Pittman, 149 N.C.App. 756, 761, 561 S.E.2d 560, 564, disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 163, 568 S.E.2d 608 (2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 982, 123 S.Ct. 1799, 155 L.Ed.2d 673 (2003). Furthermore, the General Assembly's intent was to provide par......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT