In re Price

Decision Date23 November 1897
Citation83 F. 830
PartiesIn re PRICE.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

J Laflin Kellogg, for the motion.

Max J Kohler, Asst. U.S. Atty., opposed.

LACOMBE Circuit Judge.

The return of the marshal shows that he holds two original bench warrants against defendant, issued out of the supreme court of the District of Columbia on indictments, and also a warrant of removal signed by the United States district judge in this district, directing his removal to the District of Columbia; the warrant of removal having been issued under section 1014 of the United States Revised Statutes. It will not be necessary to enter into any discussion of the proposition advanced by the district attorney that bench warrants of the supreme court of the District of Columbia run into every district of the United States, and that, under them, individuals may be seized and transported to Washington without any examination, either as to identity or probable cause, conducted by some proper judicial officer in the district where they may be seized, in accordance with the provisions of section 1014. The method would, no doubt be 'expeditious, logical, and certain.' It would also be intolerably oppressive, and, in the absence either of express legislation or controlling authority, this court is not prepared to assent to the proposition here advanced. In so doing, it concurs with the views expressed by the district court in Re Dana, 68 F. 893. The warrant of removal however, seems to have been properly issued in conformity with the provisions of section 1014. A complaint, sworn to on information and belief, was presented to the United States commissioner, who issued thereon a warrant for the arrest of Price. This complaint averred that on March 31, 1897, he did in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, 'unlawfully and feloniously steal, take, and carry away 1,330 U.S. notes of the denominations and values of five dollars each, 317 United States notes of the denomination and value of one dollar each, 105 United States silver coins of the denomination and value of twenty five cents each, 23 U.S. silver coins of the denomination and value of ten cents each, and 17 U.S. nickel coins of the denomination and value of five cents each, all lawful money of the United States, of the goods, chattels, and money of one Arthur O. Babendrier. ' Price war arrested, and demanded a hearing, and the commissioner proceeded to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • United States v. Yarborough
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • April 7, 1903
    ...(C.C.) 52 F. 104; In re Huntington (D.C.) 68 F. 881; United States v. Dana (D.C.) 68 F. 886; In re Beshears (D.C.) 79 F. 70; In re Price (C.C.) 83 F. 830; United v. Lee (D.C.) 84 F. 626; United States v. Price (D.C.) 84 F. 636; United States v. Karlin (D.C.) 85 F. 963; Price v. McCarty, 32 ......
  • United States v. Greene
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 4, 1900
    ...under the law of this state thereby virtually adopted. The views there expressed seem to have been approved by Lacombe, J., in Price's Case (C.C.) 83 F. 830; Id. (D.C.) 84 636, affirmed in 32 C.C.A. 162, 89 F. 84, 87, where the course indicated in the Dana Case was followed by the examinati......
  • Ex parte Black
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • July 27, 1906
    ...the effect of the indictment as a ground for removal. United States v. Greene (D.C.) 100 F. 941; In re Dana (D.C.) 68 F. 893, 899; In re Price (C.C.) 83 F. 830, in 32 C.C.A. 162, 89 F. 84; In re Greene (C.C.) 52 F. 106. In Beavers, v. Henkel, 194 U.S. 87, 24 Sup.Ct. 605, 48 L.Ed. 882, the c......
  • Passett v. Chase
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1926
    ...in the District of Columbia. United States v. Price (D. C.) 84 F. 636; 16 C.J. 338; 3 U.S. Comp. Stats. 1916, §§ 1674 and 1695; In re Price (C. C.) 83 F. 830. accused person is entitled to a preliminary examination to establish his identity and probable cause for his detention before warran......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT