In re Scott
Decision Date | 02 October 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 4421.,4421. |
Citation | 53 F.2d 89 |
Parties | In re SCOTT. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan |
William K. Clute, Rolland M. Shivel and Robert McAllister, all of Grand Rapids, Mich., for Committee of Grand Rapids Bar Ass'n.
Francis L. Williams, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for Edward De Groot.
Cornelius Hoffius, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for bankrupt.
In the petition for review of the referee's order declining to ratify his nomination and election as trustee in bankruptcy, petitioner alleges that he was a candidate for the office and was supported therefor by a majority of the creditors in number and amount, that he was in no way legally disqualified, and that the order should be set aside.
It appears that at the first meeting of creditors none was present in person and only one creditor was represented. The proof of claim of this creditor authorized the Grand Rapids Credit Men's Association to attend all meetings of creditors and to vote in the election of trustee. It was presented by Shirley De Groot, the collection manager for said association, who named Edward De Groot, the secretary of the association, as trustee in bankruptcy. The only objection to the election was made by the referee.
The substantial grounds upon which refusal was based may be stated as follows:
First, that the Grand Rapids Credit Men's Association has an interest on behalf of such claims as it holds which gives rise to an influence in conflict with the interests of creditors generally, and with the interests of such creditors as are not members of the association.
Second, that one of the substantial purposes of the organization is to actively solicit and secure the representation of claims in order to vote them to secure the trusteeship for one of its officers or agents, and that the association and its employees are therefore directly participating in an effort to get claims in order to control or influence the election of a trustee, contrary to the rules of this court promulgated in September, 1930.
Third, that the practice of the association in procuring proofs of claims for representation in bankruptcy cases is in violation of Act 354 of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1917, the clear purpose being to enable the association to appear and practice as an attorney at law for persons having claims before the bankruptcy court.
Fourth, because the invariable practice of the Grand Rapids Credit Men's Association is contrary to the provisions of section 72 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 112), which provides in substance that no trustee shall in any form or guise receive any other or further compensation for his services than that expressly authorized and prescribed by the act, and that the common practice of the association is to not only appropriate all trustees' fees for itself, but also to charge a collection fee approximating 15 per cent. on all claims upon which it or its employee as trustee receives dividends in bankruptcy proceedings.
Fifth, that as a matter of public policy the method and practice of the Grand Rapids Credit Men's Association affects the functioning of the bankruptcy court.
It may be stated that the qualifications, experience, character, and personal responsibility of the petitioner are not in question.
Some general considerations relative to the office of trustee in bankruptcy are important in the determination of the questions presented. It has long been recognized that he is an officer of the court; that he stands in a fiduciary relation to creditors; that he represents all creditors; and that he should have no interest to serve other than to conserve the estate. Judge Swan, in Re Columbia Iron Works (D. C.) 142 F. 234, 237, stated the relation of the trustee in bankruptcy to the court as follows:
The Circuit Court of Appeals of the Sixth Circuit has recognized the fiduciary relation of the trustee in the following language: In re Ducker, 134 F. 43, 47.
In the recent case of Garrison v. Pilliod Cabinet Co., 50 F.(2d) 1035, 1036, the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Tenth Circuit, in approving an order of the District Court which affirmed the action of the referee in bankruptcy in sustaining an objection to votes of creditors cast for one Mr. E. Garrison, the executive manager of the Wichita Association of Credit Men, as trustee, said:
In the case of In re Leader Mercantile Co. (D. C.) 29 F.(2d) 570, 571, the referee had vetoed the election of one Vernor Hall to act as trustee in bankruptcy for the primary reason that he was the manager of the North Texas Adjustment and Credit Interchange Bureau, a voluntary association of local creditors specializing in liquidating insolvent estates. The District Court affirmed the action of the referee, and in so doing stated: "As Mr. Hall is shown by this certificate to be the manager of the North Texas Adjustment and Credit Interchange Bureau, and also sought to have this bankrupt make a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors and secured powers of attorney from the creditors of the estate, which were voted for him as trustee of the estate, I think that the referee was correct in his decision not to approve the selection of Mr. Hall as the trustee of the estate, feeling that he was not in a position to render that impartial service as trustee for all of the creditors of the estate that he would for certain of the creditors."
An appeal was taken to the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Fifth Circuit, where the decision of the District Court was affirmed. See 36 F.(2d) 745, 746. The court said:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shoatz v. Wetzel, Civil Action No. 2: 13-cv-0657
... ... Kovalik United Steelworkers of America (via CM/ECF electronic notification) Dustin McDaniel Abolitionist Law Center (via CM/ECF electronic notification) Harold J. Engel (via CM/ECF electronic notification) Mary Lynch Friedline Office of Attorney General (via CM/ECF electronic notification) Scott A. Bradley Office of the Attorney General (via CM/ECF electronic notification) Yana L. Warshafsky Office of the Attorney General (via CM/ECF electronic notification) -------- Footnotes: 1. All parties have consented to jurisdiction by the undersigned Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. 636 et seq ... ...
-
Lewis v. Oates
...New York, 2 Cir., 61 F.2d 757; Lockhart v. Mittlemann, 2 Cir., 123 F.2d 703; Downey v. Fogarty, 175 Misc. 411, 23 N.Y.S.2d 585; In re Scott, D.C., 53 F.2d 89; Thompson v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 49 Misc. 102, 96 N.Y.S. 416; 6 C.J.S. Assignments, § 22, p. 1069; 5 C.J. 874, § 43. The ......
-
In re Maloney
...the examination of a bankrupt at the first meeting as the practice of law. In re Looney, 262 F. 209 (W.D.Tex.1920), In re Scott, 53 F.2d 89 (D.Mich.1931). Of special note is Rinderknecht v. Toledo Association of Credit Men, 13 F.Supp. 555, 558 (N.D.Ohio 1935), which acknowledged the profess......