In re Sirianni, 2012–02033
| Decision Date | 28 February 2018 |
| Docket Number | 2012–02033 |
| Citation | 158 A.D.3d 809,68 N.Y.S.3d 919 (Mem) |
| Parties | In the MATTER OF Thomas Anthony SIRIANNI, a suspended attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 2954154) |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION FOR REINSTATEMENT
Motion by Thomas Anthony Sirianni for reinstatement to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Mr. Sirianni was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on April 14, 1999. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 15, 2012, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against Mr. Sirianni for acts of professional misconduct set forth in a verified petition dated February 28, 2012, and the issues raised were referred to the Honorable Georgia Tschiember, as Special Referee, to hear and report. By opinion and order of this Court dated September 10, 2014, Mr. Sirianni was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, commencing October 10, 2014. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 10, 2017, Mr. Sirianni's motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on Mr. Sirianni's character and fitness to practice law.
ORDERED that, effective immediately, Thomas Anthony Sirianni is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Thomas Anthony Sirianni to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R.K. v. R.G.
...mother and child, it effectively deprived the mother of any significant quality time with the child (see Matter of Sarfati v. DeJesus, 158 A.D.3d at 809, 71 N.Y.S.3d 165 ; Matter of Patrick v. Farris, 39 A.D.3d 864, 865, 835 N.Y.S.2d 617 ; Chamberlain v. Chamberlain, 24 A.D.3d at 592–593, 8......
-
Sarfati v. DeJesus
...642 N.Y.S.2d 66 ; see Matter of Savage v. Morales, 147 A.D.3d 861, 861, 46 N.Y.S.3d 669 ). At the same time, a visitation schedule that 158 A.D.3d 809"deprives the [custodial parent] ‘of any significant quality time’ with the children[ ] is ... ‘excessive’ " ( Matter of Felty v. Felty, 108 ......
-
Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Simonsen
...granted the motion without opposition.Sirianni was subsequently reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law (see Matter of Sirianni, 158 A.D.3d 809, 68 N.Y.S.3d 919 ). Thereafter, in September 2018, Simonsen moved, through Sirianni as his counsel, in effect, to vacate the summary judgmen......
-
JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Simonsen
...granted the motion without opposition. Sirianni was subsequently reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law (see Matter of Sirianni, 158 A.D.3d 809). Thereafter, in September 2018, Simonsen moved, through Sirianni as his counsel, in effect, to vacate the summary judgment order on the gr......