In re Southern Ry. Co. Paving Assessment
Decision Date | 20 March 1929 |
Docket Number | 347. |
Parties | In re SOUTHERN RY. CO. PAVING ASSESSMENT. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Forsyth County; C. C. Lyon, Emergency Judge.
Assessment proceeding by the Town of Kernersville against the Southern Railway Company. From an assessment against its property, the railroad appealed to the superior court. The judgment upheld the assessment, and the railroad appeals. Affirmed.
Acts of parties contemporaneous with city's taking property for street is evidence of regularity of condemnation thereof, and parties' interpretation of transaction will ordinarily be followed.
The judgment in the court below is as follows:
Manly, Hendren & Womble, of Winston-Salem, for appellant.
J. L. Morehead and W. H. Murdock, both of Durham, for appellee.
It will be noted that the parties to this controversy agreed that the court below find the facts. Certain facts were agreed to, and the court heard the evidence and found the facts. The finding of facts by the court are as binding on the litigants as the findings by a jury. 38 Cyc. p. 1933 et seq.
The court below found the following facts: "That the locus in quo is one of the streets opened after the adoption of said resolution by the authorities of the Town of Kernersville, and since 1877, has been maintained as a public street of the town, and has been worked by the city forces and used by the citizens of the town continuously."
It is well settled that a municipal corporation cannot exercise the power of eminent domain and acquire land for street purposes unless authorized by its charter or under a provision in the general law. Provision made for condemnation must be bottomed on just compensation. Lloyd v. Venable, 168 N.C. page 531, 84 S.E. 855.
It is said in Raleigh v. Durfey, 163 N.C. at page 160, 79 S.E. 436, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 769:
The town of Kernersville has been in the undisputed actual adverse possession and use of the street under known and visible lines and boundaries for nearly half a century. Ordinarily continuous adverse use for over twenty years is sufficient to give title. As against an individual, there would be no question as to the rights of the town of Kernersville. State v. Fisher, 117 N.C. 733, 23 S.E. 158; Durham v. Wright, 190 N.C. 568, 130 S.E. 161; Weaver v. Pitts, 191 N.C. 747, 133 S.E. 2; Grant v. Power Co., 196 N.C. 617, 146 S.E. 531.
But C. S. § 434, is as follows: "No railroad, plank road, turnpike or canal company may be barred of, or presumed to have conveyed any real estate, right of way, easement, leasehold, or other interest in the soil which has been condemned, or otherwise obtained for its use, as a right of way, depot, stationhouse or place of landing, by any statute of limitation or by occupation of the same by any person whatever." See Carolina Cent. Railroad Co. v. McCaskill, 94 N.C. 746; Purifoy v. Railroad, 108 N.C. 100, 105, 12 S.E. 741; Bass v. Navigation Co., 111 N.C. 439, 16 S.E. 402, 19 L. R. A. 247; Railroad v. Olive, 142 N.C. 257, 55 S.E. 263; Griffith v. R. Co., 191 N.C. 84, 131 S.E. 413; Wearn v. R. Co., 191 N.C. 575, 132 S.E. 576; Dowling v. R. Co., 194 N.C. 488, 140 S.E. 213; Heaton v. Kilpatrick, 195 N.C. 708, 143 S.E. 644.
The railroad contends that, under the above statute and the decisions of this court, in no legal way did the ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morris v. Y. & B. Corporation
... ... Fry, 143 N.C. 385, 55 S.E. 787)." In the Matter of ... Assessment against Property of Railway Co., 196 N.C. 756, 147 ... S.E. 301; Colvard v. Dicus, 198 N.C. 270, ... It is ... well settled in Norfolk-Southern R. Co. v. Board of ... Com'rs of Carteret County, 188 N.C. at page 267, 124 ... S.E. 560, 561: ... ...
-
Jones v. City of Durham
... ... agree to do all underground work including street paving ... [147 S.E. 825] ... This is ... an injunctive proceeding brought by ... Southern Railway Company and other railroads to compel ... them to construct an underpass with proper ... which the city of Durham was to assume and pay the assessment ... to be charged against the Southern Railway Company and the ... North Carolina Railroad ... ...
-
Efird v. City of Winston-Salem
... ... land, whereas it was not, levied an assessment thereon of ... $8,152.20, the cost of improving and paving said assumed ... street. That prior to ... ...
-
City of Hickory v. Catawba County
... ... Colvard v. Dicus, 198 N.C. 270, 151 S.E. 191; In ... the Matter of Assessment Against Property of Southern Ry ... Co., 196 N.C. 756, 147 S.E. 301; Abbitt v ... Gregory, 195 ... ...